Error theory and reasons for belief

In Andrew Reisner & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen, Reasons for Belief. New York: Cambridge University Press (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Error Theory and the Argument from Epistemic Reasons.Rach Cosker-Rowland - 2012 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 7 (1):1-24.
The error In 'The error In The error theory'.Richard Joyce - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):519-534.
Taking the ‘Error’ Out of Ruse‘s Error Theory.James A. Ryan - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):385-397.
Defeaters and higher-level requirements.Michael Bergmann - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (220):419–436.
Two Reasons Why Epistemic Reasons Are Not Object‐Given Reasons.Anthony Robert Booth - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (1):1-14.
Knowledge is normal belief.B. Ball - 2013 - Analysis 73 (1):69-76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-25

Downloads
9 (#2,096,090)

6 months
9 (#1,232,631)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonas Olson
Stockholm University

Citations of this work

Moral Error Theory: History, Critique, Defence.Jonas Olson - 2014 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Metaepistemology.J. Adam Carter & Ernest Sosa - 2022 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Epistemic instrumentalism, permissibility, and reasons for belief.Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen - 2018 - In Conor McHugh, Jonathan Way & Daniel Whiting, Normativity: Epistemic and Practical. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 260-280.

View all 41 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references