After the fall: Religious capacities and the error theory of morality

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):751-752 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The target article proposes an error theory for religious belief. In contrast, moral beliefs are typically not counterintuitive, and some moral cognition and motivation is functional. Error theories for moral belief try to reduce morality to nonmoral psychological capacities because objective moral beliefs seem too fragile in a competitive environment. An error theory for religious belief makes this unnecessary.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Parting with illusions in evolutionary ethics.David C. Lahti - 2003 - Biology and Philosophy 18 (5):639-651.
Taking the ‘Error’ Out of Ruse‘s Error Theory.James A. Ryan - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):385-397.
The error In 'The error In The error theory'.Richard Joyce - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):519-534.
Errors upon errors: a reply to joyce.Stephen Finlay - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):535 - 547.
Hybridizing Moral Expressivism and Moral Error Theory.Toby Svoboda - 2011 - Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (1):37-48.
Quasi-realism and fundamental moral error.Andy Egan - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):205 – 219.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
171 (#240,082)

6 months
27 (#355,749)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Michael Stingl
University of Lethbridge
John Collier
University of KwaZulu-Natal

Citations of this work

Evolutionary Moral Realism.John Collier & Michael Stingl - 2013 - Biological Theory 7 (3):218-226.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references