- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On the Contrary: How to Think about Climate Skepticism
Abstract
Dr. Jay Odenbaugh discusses different types of climate skepticism and the evidence for anthropogenic climate change along with some common arguments against it. He considers the role of consensus and dissent in science and recent discussion of the book Merchants of Doubt and Climategate.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
My notes
Similar books and articles
Climate Change: Evidence of Human Causes and Arguments for Emissions Reduction.Seth D. Baum, Jacob D. Haqq-Misra & Chris Karmosky - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):393-410.
The Skeptic and the Climate Change Skeptic.Alex Worsnip - 2021 - In Michael Hannon & Jeroen de Ridder, The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology. New York: Routledge.
Is it appropriate to ‘target’ inappropriate dissent? on the normative consequences of climate skepticism.Anna Leuschner - 2018 - Synthese 195 (3):1255-1271.
Where Disagreements Can Lie.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2018 - In The Fight Against Doubt. How to Bridge the Gap Between Scientists and the Public. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 130-143.
Climate Modelling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues.Elisabeth A. Lloyd & Eric Winsberg (eds.) - 2018 - Cham: Springer Verlag.
Building Trust, Removing Doubt? Robustness Analysis and Climate Modeling.Jay Odenbaugh - 2018 - In Elisabeth A. Lloyd & Eric Winsberg, Climate Modelling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 297-321.
Climate skepticism and the manufacture of doubt: can dissent in science be epistemically detrimental?Justin B. Biddle & Anna Leuschner - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (3):261-278.
'Climategate': Paradoxical Metaphors and Political Paralysis.Brigitte Nerlich - 2010 - Environmental Values 19 (4):419-442.
How to Think Globally, Revisited.Lorraine Code - 2020 - In Manufactured Uncertainty: Implications for Climate Change Skepticism. SUNY Press. pp. 178-218.
Doubt and Denial.Lorraine Code - 2020 - In Manufactured Uncertainty: Implications for Climate Change Skepticism. SUNY Press. pp. 64-98.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-04-13
Downloads
85 (#653,050)
6 months
4 (#1,749,342)
2017-04-13
Downloads
85 (#653,050)
6 months
4 (#1,749,342)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation