Moral “Lock-In” in Responsible Innovation: The Ethical and Social Aspects of Killing Day-Old Chicks and Its Alternatives

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (5):939-960 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to provide a conceptual framework that will help in understanding and evaluating, along social and ethical lines, the issue of killing day-old male chicks and two alternative directions of responsible innovations to solve this issue. The following research questions are addressed: Why is the killing of day-old chicks morally problematic? Are the proposed alternatives morally sound? To what extent do the alternatives lead to responsible innovation? The conceptual framework demonstrates clearly that there is a moral “lock-in”, and why the killing of day-old chicks is indeed an issue. Furthermore, it is shown that both alternative directions address some important objections with regard to the killing of day-old chicks, but that they also raise new dilemmas. It also becomes clear that the framework enables and secures anticipation, reflection, deliberation with and responsiveness to stakeholders, the four dimensions of responsible innovation, in a structured way

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

A Public Survey on Handling Male Chicks in the Dutch Egg Sector.B. Gremmen, M. R. N. Bruijnis, V. Blok & E. N. Stassen - 2018 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (1):93-107.
Killing, a Conceptual Analysis.Cheng-Chih Tsai - 2017 - Ethical Perspectives 24 (3):467-499.
The Ethics of Killing Animals.Tatjana Višak & Robert Garner (eds.) - 2015 - New York: Oxford University Press USA.
The Ethics of Killing Animals.Peter Singer (ed.) - 2015 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-14

Downloads
1,248 (#38,669)

6 months
243 (#39,124)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Per Sandin
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Vincent Blok
Erasmus University Rotterdam

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - University of California Press.
"Principles of Biomedical Ethics": un bilancio.Massimo Reichlin - forthcoming - la Società Degli Individui.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler.

View all 23 references / Add more references