Carnap’s logical empiricism, values, and American pragmatism

Abstract

Value judgments are meaningless. This thesis was one of the notorious tenets of Carnap's mature logical empiricism. Less well known is the fact that in the Aufbau values were considered as philosophically respectable entities that could be constituted from value experiences. About 1930, however, values and value judgments were banished to the realm of meaningless metaphysics, and Carnap came to endorse a strict emotivism. The aim of this paper is to shed light on the question why Carnap abandoned his originally positive attitude concerning values. It is argued that his non-cognitivist attitude was the symptom of a deep-rooted and never properly dissolved tension between conflicting inclinations towards Neokantianism and Lebensphilosophie. In America Carnap's non-cognitivism became a major obstacle for a closer collaboration between logical empiricists and American pragmatists. Carnap's persisting adherence to the dualism of practical life and theoretical science was the ultimate reason why he could not accept Morris's and Kaplan's pragmatist theses that cognitivism might well be compatible with a logical and empiricist scientific philosophy.

Other Versions

original Mormann, Thomas (2006) "Carnap’s Logical Empiricism, Values, and American Pragmatism". Journal of General Philosophy of Science 38(1):127 - 146

Similar books and articles

Carnap’s Logical Empiricism, Values, and American Pragmatism.Thomas Mormann - 2006 - Journal of General Philosophy of Science 38 (1):127 - 146.
Philipp Frank’s Austro-American Logical Empiricism.Thomas Mormann - 2017 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7 (1): 56 - 86.
Carnap's Encounter with Pragmatism.Christoph Limbeck-Lilienau - 2012 - In Richard Creath, Rudolf Carnap and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag. pp. 89--111.
Engineering philosophy of science: American pragmatism and logical empiricism in the 1930s.Alan W. Richardson - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S36-S47.
Did Kuhn kill logical empiricism?George A. Reisch - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (2):264-277.
Are dinosaurs extinct?Richard Creath - 1995 - Foundations of Science 1 (2):285-297.
Carnap's Realistic Empiricism?Stathis Psillos & London School of Economics and Political Science - 1997 - London School of Economics, Centre for the Philosophy of the Natural and Social Sciences.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
301 (#144,833)

6 months
30 (#298,532)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Mormann
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München (PhD)

Citations of this work

Positivism in Action: The Case of Louis Rougier.Fons Dewulf & Massimiliano Simons - 2021 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 11 (2):461-487.
American Pragmatism and the Vienna Circle: The Early Years.Thomas Uebel - 2015 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 3 (3).
Vienna circle.Thomas Uebel - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A place for pragmatism in the dynamics of reason?Thomas Mormann - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):27-37.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (trans. Pears and McGuinness).Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1921 - New York,: Routledge. Edited by Luciano Bazzocchi & P. M. S. Hacker.
An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation.Clarence Irving Lewis - 1946 - La Salle, IL, USA: Open Court.
Philosophy and logical syntax.Rudolf Carnap - 1935 - New York: AMS Press.
Testability and meaning (part 1).Rudolf Carnap - 1936 - Philosophy of Science 3 (4):420-71.

View all 25 references / Add more references