Grueing Gettier

Logos and Episteme 5 (4):467-470 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper aims to stress the structural similarities between Nelson Goodman’s ‘new riddle of induction’ and Edmund Gettier’s counterexamples to the standard analysis of knowledge.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-27

Downloads
122 (#381,647)

6 months
21 (#489,152)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

S. - 2008 - In A. P. Martinich, A Hobbes Dictionary. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 269-298.
S.D. W. Genealogy Conway & Genealogy the Critical MethodIn Nietzsche - 2010 - In Jonathan Dancy, Ernest Sosa & Matthias Steup, A companion to epistemology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 712-762.
Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?Edmund L. Gettier - 2000 - In Sven Bernecker & Fred I. Dretske, Knowledge: Readings in Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The New Riddle of Induction.Nelson Goodman - 2011 - In Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin, The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce through the Present. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 188-201.
In defense of justified true belief.I. Thalberg - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (22):794-803.

View all 6 references / Add more references