Taxonomising the Senses

Philosophical Studies 153 (1):123-142 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that we should reject the sparse view that there are or could be only a small number of rather distinct senses. When one appreciates this then one can see that there is no need to choose between the standard criteria that have been proposed as ways of individuating the senses—representation, phenomenal character, proximal stimulus and sense organ—or any other criteria that one may deem important. Rather, one can use these criteria in conjunction to form a fine-grained taxonomy of the senses. We can think of these criteria as defining a multidimensional space within which we can locate each of the senses that we are familiar with and which also defines the space of possible senses there could be

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The number of senses.Kevin C. Klement - 2003 - Erkenntnis 58 (3):303 - 323.
The Individuation of the Senses.Mohan Matthen - 2015 - In The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Perception. New York, NY: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 567-586.
What is Touch?Matthew Ratcliffe - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):413 - 432.
Representations - senses and reasons.Benny Shanon - 1991 - Philosophical Psychology 4 (3):355-74.
On the Nature of the Senses.Richard Gray - 2011 - In Fiona Macpherson, The Senses: Classic and Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-10-05

Downloads
557 (#99,798)

6 months
60 (#150,431)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fiona Macpherson
University of Glasgow

Citations of this work

Smelling objects.Becky Millar - 2019 - Synthese 196 (10):4279-4303.
Crossmodal Basing.Zoe Jenkin - 2022 - Mind 131 (524):1163-1194.
Restricted Auditory Aspatialism.Douglas C. Wadle - 2025 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 76 (1):173-207.

View all 34 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (4):435-50.
What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal questions. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 435 - 450.
Naturalizing the Mind.Fred Dretske - 1995 - Philosophy 72 (279):150-154.

View all 19 references / Add more references