The number of senses

Erkenntnis 58 (3):303 - 323 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many philosophers still countenance senses or meanings in the broadly Fregean vein. However, it is difficult to posit the existence of senses without positing quite a lot of them, including at least one presenting every entity in existence. I discuss a number of Cantorian paradoxes that seem to result from an overly large metaphysics of senses, and various possible solutions. Certain more deflationary and nontraditional understanding of senses, and to what extent they fare better in solving the problems, are also discussed. In the end, it is concluded that one must divide senses into various ramified-orders in order to avoid antinomy, but that the philosophical justification of such orders is, as yet, still somewhat problematic.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
979 (#56,717)

6 months
247 (#34,757)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kevin C. Klement
University of Massachusetts, Amherst

References found in this work

Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.John R. Searle - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
P.Peter Gratton & Marie-Eve Morin - 2015 - In Marie-Eve Morin & Peter Gratton, The Nancy Dictionary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 174-192.
S. - 2008 - In A. P. Martinich, A Hobbes Dictionary. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 269-298.
P.Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin - 2015 - In Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin, Kant-Lexikon. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 1728-1868.

View all 34 references / Add more references