Re‐Creation and Preservation: Augustine and Hobbes on Pride and Fallen Politics

Journal of Religious Ethics 50 (2):175-195 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many scholars in religious ethics and political theory read Augustine's emphasis on pride as tied to a pessimism about politics and human nature as well as a neutralist vision of politics. Against these views, this essay argues that Augustine's vision of political humility is at once tied to a thick, non‐neutralist vision of the good and a limited view of politics' role in achieving this good on its own. To make this argument, I compare Augustine's largely neglected commentary on Genesis with that of Hobbes, a political pessimist with whom Augustine is often compared. While Hobbes's political combatting of pride adheres to a vision of mere “preservation,” Augustine's instead entails a vision of “re‐creation.” Political re‐creation is aspirational, participating in a re‐instantiation of creation's order, but it is also limited, since (re‐)creation is ultimately the work of God.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-24

Downloads
110 (#443,472)

6 months
13 (#935,850)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Leviathan.Thomas Hobbes - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by J. C. A. Gaskin.
Made with Words: Hobbes on Language, Mind, and Politics.Philip Pettit - 2009 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
The Theological Origins of Modernity.Michael Allen Gillespie - 2009 - Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
The theological origins of modernity.Michael Allen Gillespie - 1999 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 13 (1-2):1-30.

View all 34 references / Add more references