Deception in Business Networks: Is It Easier to Lie Online?

Journal of Business Ethics 90 (S4):537 - 549 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article synthesizes research presented in several models of unethical behavior to develop propositions about the factors that facilitate and mitigate deception in online business communications. The work expands the social network perspective to incorporate the medium of communication as a significant influence on deception. We go beyond existing models by developing seven propositions that identify how social network and issue moral intensity characteristics influence the probability of deception in online business communication in comparison to traditional communication channels. Remedies to detect and discourage deception in online business networks are also offered, as well as limitations and future research directions

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Self‐deception.Stanley Paluch - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):268-278.
Understanding and explaining real self-deception.Alfred R. Mele - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):127-134.
Self-deception vs. self-caused deception: A comment on professor Mele.Robert Audi - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):104-104.
The philosophy of deception.Clancy Martin (ed.) - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Deception and Mutual Trust.Peter C. Cramton - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (4):823-832.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
83 (#676,440)

6 months
18 (#615,045)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karen Patterson
Liberty University