The daoist conception of truth: Laozi's metaphysical realism vs. zhuangzi's internal realism

Abstract

In this paper, I shall present a comparative study of two leading Daoists’ different conceptions of truth in the context of modern metaphysical debate on realism and antirealism. My basic contention in this paper is that both Laozi and Zhuangzi embrace the realist's thesis that the world is largely independent of us and the way we are; it has its own objective nature.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Putnam's Internal Realism in Retrospect.Howard Sankey - 2018 - Análisis. Revista de Investigación Filosófica 5 (1):27-50.
What Is Objective Realism?Jan Voosholz - 2025 - In Towards a New Scientific Realism. Cham: Springer Nature. pp. 41-67.
Anti-Realism.Marian David - 2016 - Disputatio 8 (43):173-185.
Three Paradigms of Scientific Realism: A Truthmaking Account.Jamin Asay - 2013 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (1):1-21.
Natural Selections. [REVIEW]Ray Scott Percival - 1994 - Nature 371 (6499):666-667.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
139 (#314,984)

6 months
139 (#92,252)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

JeeLoo Liu
California State University, Fullerton

Citations of this work

Beyond the troubled water of Shifei: from disputation to walking-two-roads in the Zhuangzi.Lin Ma - 2019 - Albany: State University of New York Press. Edited by J. van Brakel.
The Interdependence of All Things.Chien-Hsing Ho - 2026 - Philosophers' Imprint 26 (16):1-13.
Laozian metaethics.Jason Dockstader - 2024 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):1-19.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references