Response to Commentators on “Rescuing Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: The Blastocyst Transfer Method”

American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):W10-W13 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite the therapeutic potential of human embryonic stem cells, many people believe that HES cell research should be banned. The reason is that the present method of extracting HES cells involves the destruction of the embryo, which for many is the beginning of a person. This paper examines a number of compromise solutions such as parthenogenesis, the use of defective embryos, genetically creating a “pseudo embryo” that can never form a placenta, and determining embryo death, and argues that none of these proposals are likely to satisfy embryoists, that is, those who regard the embryo as a person. This paper then proposes a method of extracting HES cells, what might be called the Blastocyst Transfer Method, that meets the ethical requirements of embryoists, and it considers some possible concerns regarding this method. It concludes by encouraging future HES cell research to investigate this method.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-11

Downloads
124 (#370,873)

6 months
28 (#343,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

S. Matthew Liao
New York University

References found in this work

Neuroethics: A philosophical challenge.Kathinka Evers - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (2):31 – 33.
Are 'ex Ante' enhancements always permissible?S. Matthew Liao - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):23 – 25.
Embryological viability.Françoise Baylis - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):17 – 18.

View all 14 references / Add more references