- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
'Explicating ways of consensus-making: Distinguishing the academic, the interface and the meta-consensus
In Martini Carlo, Experts and Consensus in Social Science. Springer. pp. 71-92 (2014)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement.Boaz Miller - 2013 - Synthese 190 (7):1293-1316.
The epistemic significance of consensus.Aviezer Tucker - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):501 – 521.
Higher Education, Academic Communities, and the Intellectual Virtues.Ward E. Jones - 2012 - Educational Theory 62 (6):695-711.
The problem with(out) consensus : the scientific consensus, deliberative democracy and agonistic pluralism.Jeroen Van Bouwel - 2009 - In The Social Sciences and Democracy. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Regulatory Policy and the Consensus Trap: An Agency Perspective.Daniel J. Fiorino - 1997 - Analyse & Kritik 19 (1):64-76.
Consensus conference on environmental values in radiation protection: A report on building consensus among experts.Matthias Kaiser & Ellen-Marie Forsberg - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):593-602.
Possibilities of consensus: Toward democratic moral discourse.Bruce Jennings - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):447-463.
The Rule of Non‐Opposition: Opening Up Decision‐Making by Consensus.Philippe Urfalino - 2014 - Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (3):320-341.
Scientific Consensus and Expert Testimony in Courts: Lessons from the Bendectin Litigation.Boaz Miller - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (1):15-33.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-05-12
Downloads
92 (#582,155)
6 months
15 (#771,617)
2017-05-12
Downloads
92 (#582,155)
6 months
15 (#771,617)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Epistocratie, goed idee? Over het verkennissen van democratie.Jeroen Van Bouwel - 2024 - Ethiek and Maatschappij 26 (02):3-29.
Improving deliberations by reducing misrepresentation effects.Cyrille Imbert, Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Vincent Chevrier & Christine Bourjot - 2020 - Episteme 17 (4):403-419.
Questions médicales controversées, déclarations de consensus et participation du public : le cas des conférences de consensus du National Institute of Health.Stéphanie Debray - 2022 - Dialogue 61 (1):55-81.
“That’s Your Bloody GDP, Not Ours.” On Citizen Engagement, Values, and the Case for Citizen Economics.Jeroen Van Bouwel - 2023 - Oeconomia 13 (1):49-86.
References found in this work
How to do things with words.John L. Austin - 1962 - Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon Press. Edited by Marina Sbisá & J. O. Urmson.
Group agency: the possibility, design, and status of corporate agents.Christian List & Philip Pettit - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Philip Pettit.
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Jürgen Habermas (ed.) - 1996 - Polity.
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry.Helen E. Longino - 1990 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation