Autopoiesis and Autonomy in the Space of Meaning

Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):175-177 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Social Autopoiesis?” by Hugo Urrestarazu. Upshot: Social autopoiesis does not operate in physical space and cannot be understood by analyzing cause-effect relationships. Social systems are observing systems operating in the space of meaning. Therefore a validation procedure guided by the classic rules for determining autopoietic systems is misleading. However, the target article clarifies a point of great importance for sociological research: the difference between autopoiesis and autonomy (closure

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Autopoiesis of Social Systems.R. Vanderstraeten - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):181-183.
Communication, Autopoiesis and Semiosis.H. F. Alrøe & E. Noe - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):183-185.
Understanding Social Systems?H. R. Maturana - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):187-188.
Social Systems: Unearthing the Big Picture.S. J. Cowley & V. Raimondi - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):179-181.
Human Autopoiesis?A. Kravchenko - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):177-179.
How Can a Social System Be Autopoietic?Raivo Palmaru - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):170-172.
Freedom and Constraints.J. Stewart - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):186-186.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-15

Downloads
12 (#2,019,602)

6 months
12 (#966,368)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references