Communication, Autopoiesis and Semiosis

Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):183-185 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Social Autopoiesis?” by Hugo Urrestarazu. Upshot: We agree on the need to explore a concept of social autopoiesis that goes beyond a strictly human-centered concept of social systems as autopoietic communicative systems. But both Hugo Urrestarazu and Niklas Luhmann neglect the importance of semiosis in understanding communication, and this has important implications for the question of a more general approach to social systems.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Autopoiesis of Social Systems.R. Vanderstraeten - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):181-183.
Autopoiesis and Autonomy in the Space of Meaning.A. Karafillidis - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):175-177.
Understanding Social Systems?H. R. Maturana - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):187-188.
Human Autopoiesis?A. Kravchenko - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):177-179.
Social Systems: Unearthing the Big Picture.S. J. Cowley & V. Raimondi - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):179-181.
How Can a Social System Be Autopoietic?Raivo Palmaru - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):170-172.
Freedom and Constraints.J. Stewart - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):186-186.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-15

Downloads
307 (#143,009)

6 months
159 (#77,388)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hugo F. Alrøe
University of Aarhus