Public Philosophy and Trans Activism

In Lee McIntyre, Nancy McHugh & Ian Olasov, A companion to public philosophy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 186–200 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter explores how what is dismissed as “trans activism” is often public philosophy. It considers how so‐called “public philosophy” on trans issues often does a substantially worse job of living up to the name. The chapter discusses how the dichotomy between “trans activism” and “public philosophy” provides a pretext for marginalizing trans voices. To draw on Black feminist philosophical thought, lived experience is a criterion for knowledge of the needs of marginalized people. Like other marginalized communities, trans communities have encountered many areas in which hermeneutical liberation is needed. Public philosophy as trans activism is often systemically and systematically ignored or willfully misinterpreted as being biased and motivated by self‐interest, whereas anti‐trans (public) philosophy is seen as asking the important questions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
111 (#437,428)

6 months
44 (#192,420)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

B. R. George
University of California, Los Angeles (PhD)

Citations of this work

The Availability of the Non-Ideal.Nikki Ernst - 2024 - Wittgenstein-Studien 15 (1):87-105.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references