- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The forensic application of "brain fingerprinting:" Why scientists should encourage the use of p300 memory detection methods
American Journal of Bioethics 8 (1):30 – 32 (2008)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Neuroimaging techniques for memory detection: Scientific, ethical, and legal issues.Daniel V. Meegan - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (1):9 – 20.
Brain imaging and the bill of rights: Memory detection technologies and american criminal justice.Dov Fox - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (1):34 – 36.
The American Journal of Bioethics Today.Paul Root Wolpe - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (10):4-4.
Emerging Neurotechnologies for Lie-Detection: Promises and Perils.Paul Root Wolpe, Kenneth R. Foster & Daniel D. Langleben - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (2):39-49.
Responsible Innovation in Social Epistemic Systems: The P300 Memory Detection Test and the Legal Trial.John Danaher - forthcoming - In Van den Hoven, Responsible Innovation Volume II: Concepts, Approaches, Applications. Springer.
Neuroimaging techniques for memory detection: Scientific, ethical, and legal issues.Johanna C. van Hooff - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (1):25 – 26.
Response to commentators on "emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: Promises and perils?".Paul Root Wolpe, Kenneth R. Foster & Daniel D. Langleben - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (2):W5.
The Comparative Advantages of Brain-Based Lie Detection: The P300 Concealed Information Test and Pre-trial Bargaining.John Danaher - 2015 - International Journal of Evidence and Proof 19 (1).
Evaluating graduate programs in bioethics: What measures should we use?Glenn McGee, David Magnus & Kelly Carroll - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (4):1 – 2.
Why should we be concerned about disparate impact?Ronald A. Lindsay - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (5):23 – 24.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
86 (#642,380)
6 months
4 (#1,747,044)
2009-01-28
Downloads
86 (#642,380)
6 months
4 (#1,747,044)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Three Rationales for a Legal Right to Mental Integrity.Thomas Douglas & Lisa Forsberg - 2021 - In S. Ligthart, D. van Toor, T. Kooijmans, T. Douglas & G. Meynen, Neurolaw: Advances in Neuroscience, Justice and Security. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Neuroimaging Techniques for Memory Detection: Scientific, Ethical and Legal Issues".Daniel V. Meegan - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (1):1-4.
References found in this work
Universal Declaration of Human Rights.United Nations - 1948 - Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 21 (1-2):153-160.
Neuroimaging techniques for memory detection: Scientific, ethical, and legal issues.Daniel V. Meegan - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (1):9 – 20.
Estimating the validity of the guilty knowledge test from simulated experiments: the external validity of mock crime studies.David Carmel, Eran Dayan, Ayelet Naveh, Ori Raveh & Gershon Ben-Shakhar - 2003 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 9 (4):261.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation