Testing significance testing: A flawed defense

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):204-204 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most psychometricians believe that the significance test is counterproductive. I have read Chow's book to see whether it addresses or rebuts any of the key facts brought out by the psychometricians. The book is empty on this score; it is entirely irrelevant to the current debate. It presents nothing new and is riddled with errors.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

A plea for Popperian significance testing.Zeno G. Swijtink - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):220-221.
Significance testing – does it need this defence?Günther Palm - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):214-215.
A defense of statistical power analysis.Brian R. Lashley - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):209-210.
The logic of Null hypothesis testing.Edward Erwin - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):197-198.
Costs and benefits of statistical significance tests.Michael G. Shafto - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):218-219.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
90 (#600,740)

6 months
17 (#690,063)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references