Significance testing – does it need this defence?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):214-215 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Chow's (1996) Statistical significance is a defence of null-hypothesis significance testing (NHSTP). The most common and straightforward use of significance testing is for the statistical corroboration of general hypotheses. In this case, criticisms of NHSTP, at least those mentioned in the book, are unfounded or misdirected. This point is driven home by the author a bit too forcefully and meticulously. The awkward and cumbersome organisation and argumentation of the book makes it even harder to read.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Costs and benefits of statistical significance tests.Michael G. Shafto - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):218-219.
The logic of Null hypothesis testing.Edward Erwin - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):197-198.
The Null-hypothesis significance-test procedure is still warranted.Siu L. Chow - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):228-235.
Précis of statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and utility.Siu L. Chow - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):169-194.
A defense of statistical power analysis.Brian R. Lashley - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):209-210.
Some problems with Chow's problems with power.Deborah G. Mayo - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):212-213.
A plea for Popperian significance testing.Zeno G. Swijtink - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):220-221.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
128 (#354,105)

6 months
19 (#597,274)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references