Should We Narrow the Scope of “Racism” to Accommodate White Sensitivities?

Critical Philosophy of Race 7 (2):223-246 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article critically examines the proposal that the word "racism" should be restricted to the most egregious of racial ills. It argues that the costs of restricting the scope of the term in this way are too great and that the proposal gives too much weight to white sensitivities.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The scope of rational requirements.John Brunero - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):28-49.
State or process requirements?Niko Kolodny - 2007 - Mind 116 (462):371-385.
Xenophobia and Racism.David Haekwon Kim & Ronald Sundstrom - 2014 - Critical Philosophy of Race 2 (1):20-45.
Unifying the requirements of rationality.Andrew Reisner - 2009 - Philosophical Explorations 12 (3):243-260.
Narrow-Scoping for Wide-Scopers.Alex Worsnip - 2015 - Synthese 192 (8):2617-2646.
Wide or narrow scope?John Broome - 2007 - Mind 116 (462):359-370.
Racism as disrespect.Joshua Glasgow - 2009 - Ethics 120 (1):64-93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-04

Downloads
176 (#231,933)

6 months
3 (#1,846,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Hardimon
University of California, San Diego

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references