Animal care ethics, ANZCCART, and public perceptions of animal use ethics

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3):249-257 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The public attitude to animal use in Australia and New Zealandcan be inferred from survey results and political activity. The publicis concerned about the rights of animals as far as any uses causing painare concerned, but takes a more utilitarian view of the taking of lifewhere no suffering is involved. Many of the participants in two recentANZCCART conferences fall short in their knowledge of and attitudetoward these concerns. Animal welfare legislation and standards need tobe reformed so that painful animal use is eliminated, even if economicgrowth suffers as a result.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animal care ethics, ANZCCART, and public perceptions of animal use ethics.Michael Morris - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3-4):249-257.
Raising the Bar in the Justification of Animal Research.Elisa Galgut - 2015 - Journal of Animal Ethics 5 (1):5-19,.
No Room at the Zoo: Management Euthanasia and Animal Welfare.Heather Browning - 2018 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (4):483-498.
Minimizing harm in agricultural animal experiments in new zealand.M. C. Morris & S. A. Weaver - 2003 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (5):421-437.
Why Non-invasive Animal Studies Should Seek Ethical Review. [REVIEW]Anthony Rowe - 2025 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 39 (1):4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
109 (#450,501)

6 months
18 (#615,045)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fred Gifford
Michigan State University

References found in this work

S.Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin - 2015 - In Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin, Kant-Lexikon. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 1995-2243.
Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
S. - 2008 - In A. P. Martinich, A Hobbes Dictionary. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 269-298.
The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn, Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 425-434.
Animals and why they matter.Mary Midgley - 1983 - Athens: University of Georgia Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references