The Role of Love in Animal Ethics

Hypatia 27 (3):583-600 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophers working on animal ethics have focused, with good reason, on the wrongness of cruelty toward animals and of devaluing their lives. I argue that the theoretical resources of animal ethics are far from exhausted. Moreover, reflection on what makes animals ethically significant is relevant for thinking about the roots of morality and therefore about ethical relationships between human beings. I rely on a normative approach to animal ethics grounded in the importance of meeting needs in general and, in particular, needs for affection and companionship. I draw on testimonies of shared love between people and animals, and on Raimond Gaita's work on the importance of emotional connections between creatures who are similarly needy. The ethics of care, which attaches special importance to meeting needs, provides an integrative theoretical framework

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-24

Downloads
187 (#216,201)

6 months
15 (#807,222)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anca Gheaus
Central European University

References found in this work

Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn, Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 425-434.
Necessity, Volition, and Love.Harry G. zFrankfurt - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Animal Liberation.Bill Puka & Peter Singer - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (4):557.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.

View all 25 references / Add more references