Comments on Taylor's Theses

Review of Metaphysics 7 (4):681 - 689 (1954)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

1. If Taylor's first two proposals are accepted, we must introduce a term to replace "know" in a familiar, but weaker, sense of the word. In ordinary speech it is correct to say that I know that p, even if my conviction that p might be somewhat increased by further evidence. In Taylor's stronger sense of "know" and "knowledge," it is doubtful that we have much, if any, knowledge. For even if we sometimes have evidence which is conclusive, and which therefore might be said to "justify" complete conviction, it can still be doubted that in such cases we are as fully convinced as we could be.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comments on professor Postow's paper.Roderick Firth - 1978 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (1):122-123.
Abstracts of comments.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1976 - Noûs 10 (1):33-34.
Comments and replies.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1978 - Philosophia 7 (3-4):597-636.
Response to Comments.Richard Taylor - 1954 - Review of Metaphysics 7 (4):689 - 693.
Reply to professor Roderick Chisholm and comments.Henri Lefebvre - 1969 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30 (1):22-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
96 (#546,216)

6 months
46 (#179,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references