Relativity in Categories 7, Topics, and Sophistical Refutations

In Ancient Relativity: Plato, Aristotle, Stoics, and Sceptics. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 90-117 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aristotle discusses relatives in the _Categories, Topics_, and _Sophistical Refutations_. This chapter begins to argue that Aristotle adapted Plato’s ideas about relativity into an Aristotelian framework. In the _Categories_, Aristotle defines relatives (6a36–b10) then discusses four hallmarks of the class of relatives: contrariety (6b15–18), scalability (6b19–27), reciprocity (6b28–7b14), and simultaneity (7b15–8a12). This chapter clarifies what these hallmarks are and shows how constitutive relativity is involved in the hallmarks. The chapter goes on to discuss how Aristotle treats the idea that relatives can fall into genus and species structures and how Aristotle treats the definition of relatives.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction.Matthew Duncombe - 2020 - In Ancient Relativity: Plato, Aristotle, Stoics, and Sceptics. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-22.
Stoic relativity.Matthew Duncombe - 2020 - In Ancient Relativity: Plato, Aristotle, Stoics, and Sceptics. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 181-201.

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-01-22

Downloads
15 (#1,948,312)

6 months
15 (#767,014)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Duncombe
Nottingham University

References found in this work

Separation.Gail Fine - 1984 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2:31-87.
Separation: A Reply to Morrison.Gail Fine - 1985 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 3:159-65.
Separation: a reply to Fine.Donald Morrison - 1985 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 3:167-173.
Aristotle on Accidental Causation.Tyler Huismann - 2016 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (4):561-575.

View all 9 references / Add more references