Il migliore dei naturalismi possibili

Rivista di Estetica 44:157-169 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we first set out three requirements that each e-theory – a theory whose task is to explain data – must fulfill in order to be one such good theory: i) an ontological requirement, i.e. adequate simplicity, ii) a methodological requirement, i.e. plurality of research procedures, iii) an epistemological requirement, i.e. compatibility with the best available epistemical procedures. Moreover, we will claim that from the metaphilosophical point of view, unlike scientific naturalism on the one hand and supernaturalism on the other, liberal naturalism is the only philosophical approach capable of fulfilling all such requirements.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Defeaters and higher-level requirements.Michael Bergmann - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (220):419–436.
Finding a fundamental principle of democratic inclusion: related, not affected or subjected.Andreas Bengtson - 2026 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 69 (2):1-20.
Asymmetry, Scope, and Rational Consistency.Julian Fink - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):109-130.
All the Existences that There Are.Alberto Voltolini - 2012 - Disputatio 4 (32):361-383.
Price's Subject Naturalism and Liberal Naturalism.Lionel Shapiro - 2022 - In Mario De Caro & David Macarthur, The Routledge Handbook of Liberal Naturalism. New York, NY: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-21

Downloads
87 (#631,510)

6 months
6 (#1,534,242)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Mario De Caro
Tufts University
Alberto Voltolini
University of Turin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations