The Life-Saving Analogy

In The Moral Demands of Affluence. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 7-15 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many writers have followed Peter Singer in drawing an analogy between assisting needy people at a distance and saving someone’s life directly. Arguments based on this analogy can take either a subsumptive or a non-subsumptive form. Such arguments face a serious methodological challenge.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Argument from Beneficence.Garrett Cullity - 2006 - In The Moral Demands of Affluence. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 16-33.
Requirement.Garrett Cullity - 2006 - In The Moral Demands of Affluence. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 167-188.
The Extreme Demand.Garrett Cullity - 2006 - In The Moral Demands of Affluence. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 70-89.
The Extreme Demand.Garrett Cullity - 2006 - In The Moral Demands of Affluence. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Saving Lives.Garrett Cullity - 2006 - In The Moral Demands of Affluence. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 54-69.
Direct versus Indirect Aid.Larry S. Temkin - 2022 - In Being Good in a World of Need. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 94-108.

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-01-22

Downloads
2 (#2,335,236)

6 months
2 (#1,994,618)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Garrett Cullity
Australian National University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references