- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Getting to the source of the illusion of consensus
Cognition 223 (C):105023 (2022)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
There is no stream of consciousness.Susan J. Blackmore - 2002 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 9 (5-6):17-28.
Reading is believing: The truth effect and source credibility.Linda A. Henkel & Mark E. Mattson - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1705-1721.
The Genealogy of Content or the Future of an Illusion.Alex Rosenberg - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (3):537-547.
Looking at Animals Looking: Art, Illusion, and Power.I. Illusion - 1990 - In Frederick Burwick & Walter Pape, Aesthetic illusion: theoretical and historical approaches. New York: W. de Gruyter. pp. 65.
The grand grand illusion illusion.Jonathan Cohen - 2002 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 9 (5-6):141-157.
What Kind of an Illusion is the Illusion of Self.Karsten J. Struhl - 2020 - Comparative Philosophy 11 (2).
Consciousness as Presence: An Exploration of the Illusion of Self.Charles Kedric Fink - 2013 - Buddhist Studies Review 30 (1):113-128.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-04-08
Downloads
45 (#1,275,705)
6 months
8 (#1,303,858)
2022-04-08
Downloads
45 (#1,275,705)
6 months
8 (#1,303,858)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Belief polarization can be caused by disagreements over source independence: Computational modelling, experimental evidence, and applicability to real-world politics.David J. Young, Jens Koed Madsen & Lee H. de-Wit - 2025 - Cognition 259 (C):106126.
Sensitivity to Evidential Dependencies in Judgments Under Uncertainty.Belinda Xie & Brett Hayes - 2022 - Cognitive Science 46 (5):e13144.
How wise is the crowd: Can we infer people are accurate and competent merely because they agree with each other?Jan Pfänder, Benoît De Courson & Hugo Mercier - 2025 - Cognition 255 (C):106005.
Changing your mind about the data: Updating sampling assumptions in inductive inference.Brett K. Hayes, Joshua Pham, Jaimie Lee, Andrew Perfors, Keith Ransom & Saoirse Connor Desai - 2024 - Cognition 245 (C):105717.
References found in this work
Opinion leaders, independence, and Condorcet's Jury Theorem.David M. Estlund - 1994 - Theory and Decision 36 (2):131-162.
The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning.Richard E. Nisbett, David H. Krantz, Christopher Jepson & Ziva Kunda - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):339-363.
How Communication Can Make Voters Choose Less Well.Ulrike Hahn, Momme von Sydow & Christoph Merdes - 2019 - Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (1):194-206.
Dependencies in evidential reports: The case for informational advantages.Toby D. Pilditch, Ulrike Hahn, Norman Fenton & David Lagnado - 2020 - Cognition 204 (C):104343.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation