The Doxastic Account of Intellectual Humility

Logos and Episteme 7 (4):413-433 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper will be broken down into four sections. In §1, I try to assuage a worry that intellectual humility is not really an intellectual virtue. In §2, we will consider the two dominant accounts of intellectual humility in the philosophical literature—the low concern for status account the limitations-owing account—and I will argue that both accounts face serious worries. Then in §3, I will unpack my own view, the doxastic account of intellectual humility, as a viable alternative and potentially a better starting place for thinking about this virtue. And I’ll conclude in §4 by trying to defend the doxastic account against some possible objections.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-06

Downloads
1,805 (#19,079)

6 months
171 (#71,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ian M. Church
Hillsdale College

Citations of this work

Intellectual Servility and Timidity.Alessandra Tanesini - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Research 43:21-41.
Humble Reasoning: When can I stop?Julia Staffel - forthcoming - Canadian Journal of Philosophy.
Moral Grandstanding and the Norms of Moral Discourse.A. K. Flowerree & Mark Satta - 2024 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 10 (3):483-502.
Too humble for words.Neil Levy - 2023 - Philosophical Studies 180 (10):3141-3160.

View all 32 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and success from ability.John Greco - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (1):17 - 26.
Intellectual Humility.Ian M. Church & Justin Barrett - 2016 - In Everett L. Worthington Jr, Don E. Davis & Joshua N. Hook, Routledge Handbook of Humility. Springer.

Add more references