Introduction: relational equality and intergenerational justice

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 28 (3):375-381 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Intergenerational justice has in recent decades become an increasingly important subfield of political philosophy. However, due to the absence of coexistence and other aspects of the intergenerational context, it is often unclear whether and how many ideals of justice apply. As such, relational egalitarianism – the view that justice requires equal social relationships – may appear particularly implausible in this domain. In this introduction, we explain this issue, motivating its further examination. Finally, we briefly summarize how the papers in this volume take up this challenge and offer insightful developments on both fronts, advancing our understanding of intergenerational justice and relational egalitarianism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Intergenerational Justice Dilemma for Relational Egalitarians.Andreas Bengtson - 2025 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 28 (3):402-420.
Relational egalitarianism, future generations, and arguments from overlap.Tim Meijers & Dick Timmer - 2025 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 28 (3):443-463.
Making sense of age-group justice.Juliana Bidadanure - 2016 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15 (3):234-260.
Relational Egalitarianism.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2021 - In Jeff McMahan, Tim Campbell, James Goodrich & Ketan Ramakrishnan, Principles and Persons: The Legacy of Derek Parfit. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 417-438.
Conclusion.Christian Schemmel - 2021 - In Justice and Egalitarian Relations. New York, US: Oxford University Press. pp. 288-300.
Social relations, institutional status, and future people.Devon Cass - 2025 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 28 (3):481-499.
Introduction: democracy, equality, and justice.Matt Matravers & Lukas Meyer - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1):1-15.
Making the future safe for relational equality: social categories and intergenerational justice.Shuk Ying Chan - 2025 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 28 (3):464-480.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-02-15

Downloads
85 (#653,938)

6 months
25 (#388,002)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Devon Cass
Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Andre Santos Campos
Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Citations of this work

Intergenerational Moral Inequality and the Long-Term Future.Giacomo Floris - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.
La soddisfazione dei bisogni fondamentali delle generazioni future.Fabian Schuppert - 2025 - Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Politica 9:43-62.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford Paperbacks.
Justice and Egalitarian Relations.Christian Schemmel - 2021 - New York, US: Oxford University Press.
The Practice of Equality.Samuel Scheffler - 2015 - In Carina Fourie, Fabian Schuppert & Ivo Wallimann-Helmer, Social Equality: On What It Means to be Equals. New York, US: OUP Usa. pp. 20-44.
What should egalitarians believe?Martin O’Neill - 2008 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (2):119-156.
Who Can Be Wronged?Rahul Kumar - 2003 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (2):99-118.

View all 13 references / Add more references