The metaphysics of time reversal: Hutchison on classical mechanics

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (3):331-340 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What grounds the standard claim that classical mechanics is time-reversal invariant? Hutchison (1993, 1995) challenges the conventional reasoning underlying the belief that classical mechanics is time reversal invariant and argues that it is not in any well-defined sense. I find a defensible criterion that will exclude his cases, thereby rescuing a sense in which we can say that classical mechanics is time reversal invariant.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
255 (#162,762)

6 months
40 (#213,000)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Craig Callender
University of California, San Diego

Citations of this work

Against Symmetry Fundamentalism.Cristian Lopez - 2025 - Erkenntnis 90 (5):1821-1845.
Time in Thermodynamics.Jill North - 2011 - In Craig Callender, The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 312--350.
Is time 'handed' in a quantum world?Craig Callender - 2000 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (1):247-269.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references