Some Comfort for the Closure Skeptic

In Essays on skepticism. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 358-366 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter addresses a recent challenge from Marian David and Ted Warfield: Can you state a closure principle that is both plausible and usable in a sceptical argument that applies to every putative knower? They argue ‘No’ while the author replies ‘Yes’.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Strategies for Refuting Closure for Knowledge.Anthony Brueckner - 2010 - In Essays on skepticism. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 341-342.
Skepticism: Contemporary Readings.Keith DeRose & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Closure and Underdetermination Again.Ju Wang - 2014 - Philosophia 42 (4):1129-1140.
The Structure of the Skeptical Argument.Anthony Brueckner - 2010 - In Essays on skepticism. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 319-326.
When does epistemic closure fail?M. Yan - 2013 - Analysis 73 (2):260-264.
Skeptical Effectiveness: A Reply to Buford and Brueckner.Peter Murphy - 2016 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 6 (4):397-403.
Knowledge-closure and skepticism.Marian David & Ted A. Warfield - 2008 - In Quentin Smith, Epistemology: new essays. New York : Oxford University Press,: Oxford University Press. pp. 137-188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-01-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references