Four Problems about Self-Locating Belief

Philosophical Review 121 (2):149-177 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article defends the Doomsday Argument, the Halfer Position in Sleeping Beauty, the Fine-Tuning Argument, and the applicability of Bayesian confirmation theory to the Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics. It will argue that all four problems have the same structure, and it gives a unified treatment that uses simple models of the cases and no controversial assumptions about confirmation or self-locating evidence. The article will argue that the troublesome feature of all these cases is not self-location but selection effects.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Bayesianism And Self-Locating Beliefs.Darren Bradley - 2007 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Existential Bias.Casper Storm Hansen - 2023 - Episteme 20 (3):701-721.
Everettian Confirmation and Sleeping Beauty.Alastair Wilson - 2014 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (3):573-598.
Everettian Confirmation and Sleeping Beauty.Alastair Wilson - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (3):axt018.
The evidential relevance of self-locating information.Kai Draper - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (1):185-202.
Belief Update across Fission.Wolfgang Schwarz - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (3):659-682.
Everettian Confirmation and Sleeping Beauty: Reply to Wilson.Darren Bradley - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (3):683-693.
Choosing beauty.S. Friederich - 2017 - Logique Et Analyse 60:449-463.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
2,597 (#9,206)

6 months
364 (#16,438)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Darren Bradley
University of Leeds