Creeped Out

In Uriah Kriegel, Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Mind Vol 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 213-229 (2026)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines both creepiness and the distinctive reaction had to creepiness, being “creeped out.” The paper defends a response-dependent account of creepiness in terms of this distinctive reaction, contrasting our preferred account to others that might be offered. The paper concludes with a discussion of the value of detecting creepiness.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-07

Downloads
22,616 (#182)

6 months
779 (#2,704)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Daniel Nolan
University of California, Santa Cruz
Sara Bernstein
University of California, Santa Cruz

Citations of this work

The Psychology, Geography, and Architecture of Horror: How Places Creep Us Out.Francis T. McAndrew - 2020 - Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture 4 (2):47-62.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Dispositional Theories of Value.Michael Smith, David Lewis & Mark Johnston - 1989 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 63 (1):89-174.
A Sensible Subjectivism.David Wiggins - 1987 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Making Monsters: The Uncanny Power of Dehumanization.David Livingstone Smith - 2021 - Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press.
Sentiment and value.Justin D’Arms & Daniel Jacobson - 2000 - Ethics 110 (4):722-748.
Response-Dependence and Aesthetic Theory.Alex King - 2022 - In Chris Howard & Rach Cosker-Rowland, Fittingness. Oxford University Press. pp. 309-326.

View all 10 references / Add more references