The Modal Theory of Function Is Not about Functions

Philosophy of Science 81 (4):580-591 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a series of papers, Bence Nanay has recently put forward and defended a new theory of function, which he calls the ‘Modal Theory of Function’. In this article, I critically address this theory and argue that it fails to fulfill some key desiderata that a satisfactory theory of function must comply with. As a result, I conclude that, whatever property Nanay’s notion of function refers to, it is not the property having the function that is standardly attributed in science.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Function, modality, mental content.Bence Nanay - 2011 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 32 (2):84-87.
Function and Modality.Osamu Kiritani - 2011 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 32 (1):1-4.
Artifact Categorization and the Modal Theory of Artifact Function.Bence Nanay - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (3):515-526.
Fitness and function.D. M. Walsh - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):553-574.
Modality and Function: Reply to Nanay.Osamu Kiritani - 2011 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 32 (2):89-90.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-09-26

Downloads
856 (#67,414)

6 months
120 (#107,040)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marc Artiga
Universitat De València

References found in this work

Functional analysis.Robert E. Cummins - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (20):741-64.
In defense of proper functions.Ruth Millikan - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (June):288-302.
Functions.Larry Wright - 1973 - Philosophical Review 82 (2):139-168.
An organizational account of biological functions.Matteo Mossio, Cristian Saborido & Alvaro Moreno - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):813-841.

View all 20 references / Add more references