Debate: Legal Probabilism—A Qualified Rejection: A Response to Hedden and Colyvan

Journal of Political Philosophy 28 (1):117-128 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Journal of Political Philosophy, EarlyView.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legal Probabilism: A Qualified Defence.Brian Hedden & Mark Colyvan - 2019 - Journal of Political Philosophy 27 (4):448-468.
Debate: Legitimate injustice: A response to Wellman.Jonathan Quong - 2023 - Journal of Political Philosophy 31 (2):222-232.
Debate: Taking Offense.George Sher - 2020 - Journal of Political Philosophy 28 (3):332-342.
Debate: Political Authority, Functionalism, and the Problem of Annexation.Arthur Hill - 2024 - Journal of Political Philosophy 32 (1-4):98-111.
Debate: Taking Offense: A Reply.Jeremy Waldron - 2020 - Journal of Political Philosophy 28 (3):343-352.
Legal Transitions without Legitimate Expectations.Fergus Green - 2020 - Journal of Political Philosophy 28 (4):397-420.
Ronald Dworkin : life and works.Lokendra Malik - 2018 - In Salman Khurshid, Lokendra Malik & Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco, Dignity in the legal and political philosophy of Ronald Dworkin. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-03

Downloads
68 (#875,682)

6 months
15 (#807,222)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references