Laboratory Safety and Nanotechnology Workers: an Analysis of Current Guidelines in the USA

NanoEthics 10 (1):5-23 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although some regulatory frameworks for the occupational health and safety of nanotechnology workers have been developed, worker safety and health issues in these laboratory environments have received less attention than many other areas of nanotechnology regulation. In addition, workers in nanotechnology labs are likely to face unknown risks and hazards because few of the guidelines and rules for worker safety are mandatory. In this article, we provide an overview of the current health and safety guidelines for nanotechnology laboratory workers by exploring guidelines from different organizations, including the Department of Energy Nanoscale Science Research Centers, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Texas A&M University, and University of Massachusetts-Lowell. After discussing these current guidelines, we apply an ethical framework to each set of guidelines to explore any gaps that might exist in them. By conducting this gap analysis, we are able to highlight some of the weaknesses that might be important for future policy development in this area. We conclude by outlining how future guidelines might address some of these gaps, specifically the issue of workers’ participation in the process of establishing safety measures and the development and enforcement of more unified guidelines.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Regulating Nanomaterials: A Case for Hybrid Governance.Thomas A. Hemphill - 2016 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 36 (4):219-228.
Nanotechnology Policy and Education.Regan Stinnett - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (4):551-552.
A Case for Recognizing the Rights of Animals as Workers.Rosemary Shaw - 2018 - Journal of Animal Ethics 8 (2):182-198.
Occupational Safety.Henk ten Have & Maria do Céu Patrão Neves - 2021 - In Henk ten Have & Maria do Céu Patrão Neves, Dictionary of Global Bioethics. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 777-777.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-05

Downloads
101 (#504,799)

6 months
17 (#696,575)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Reason and morality.Alan Gewirth - 1978 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Encyclopedia of bioethics.Robert Veatch & T. W. Reich - forthcoming - Encyclopedia of Bioethics.
Bioethics: a return to fundamentals.Bernard Gert - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Charles M. Culver & K. Danner Clouser.
Reason and Morality.Alan Gewirth - 1968 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 170 (4):444-445.

View all 15 references / Add more references