pegkerr: (I do not understand all this)
I am still trying to come up with a proposal for Fantasy Matters.

Okay, for once I really am looking for advice. Amazing, Peg's actually asking for advice! I just have to get them 250 words of a proposal by Friday, something that looks half-baked enough that they might actually accept it.

Hearts of flesh and stone. Gee, I want to do something about this, because I've been chewing over it for so long, but right now whenever I attempt to corral my thoughts on this, they scatter unhelpfully in all directions like skittering mice, refusing to coalesce. Perhaps its the lingering effect of anaesthesia on the brain. I'd prefer to think it's that, rather than rank stupidity. However, whatever the cause, the problem remains the same: I need to come up with something!

Thinking about: The Snow Queen (the mirror cracks, a piece of glass lodges in Kay's heart, making it cold and frozen). I could re-visit A.S. Byatt's essay "Ice, Snow, Glass" in Mirror, Mirror on the Wall which I ran across while researching the ice palace book, and it really impressed me at the at time. But then I'm kinda pissed with A.S. Byatt at the moment (see "A.S. Byatt and the Goblet of Bile").

I've been thinking of my earlier essays on Heart of Flesh/Heart of Stone. I'm thinking about the afterward to Tam Lin, which started my whole obsession with this subject (although [livejournal.com profile] pameladean said the book was about the study of literature, and how that prevents the heart of stone, rather than about fantasy per se. But why did she choose a fantasy to tell the story? Other than the fact that, duh, she's a fantasy writer?) I've been thinking about George MacDonald's "The Light Princess," which is kinda getting at sort of the same stuff, sideways (using "gravity" and tears as the metaphor for the stamp of humanity, rather than the heart of flesh). Can people name other stories or tales which feature a heart of stone, or that explore this dichotomy? Esp. fantasy stories? Here is a pretty cool story that gets at what I'm struggling to articulate: "The Girl With the Heart of Stone." I've talked about seeing the theme in fiction in general (i.e., in Austen and Dickens) but what does fantasy in particular have to say about this theme?

Throw me a lifeline, anybody, help! Any thoughts that this sparks in you. I'll be ever so touchingly grateful.

Peg, hopefully

Thank you, Friendslist! You're the best! I knew you would come through!



I am now feeling much more confident.

Love and kisses,
Peg
pegkerr: (Both the sweet and the bitter)
After having a dozen odd short stories and two novels published, I almost accidentally pinpointed what my fiction is about when I sat down for the very first brainstorming session on my third novel, the ice palace novel I’m sorta kinda working on now. If you remember, I traced it back to the end essay of [livejournal.com profile] pameladean’s book Tam Lin, where she said that book was about choosing between heart of flesh and the heart of stone that the world wants to put in. As I’ve been thinking about it more ever since I wrote that entry, I’ve realized that the stories I’ve loved the most (the ones I’ve read as well as the ones I’ve written) have always been about that.

Yesterday, I pointed to an entry about an encounter at a coffeeshop, which [livejournal.com profile] magdalene1 suggested could be the birth of a new love. I haven’t read all the comments that entry generated, but Rob did, and he pointed out the parody that [livejournal.com profile] awatson did.

I couldn’t find a more elegant contrast between a heart of flesh and a heart of stone if I tried.

The very first short story I had published was a story about a young woman who works in a munitions factory goes to visit for a day her grandmother who lives in a deserted, bombed-out city. The grandmother at the end of the story gave the younger woman her two precious teacups, all that she had left of the bygone day before the war came. I realize now that right back there at the very beginning of my career, I was preoccupied with this same theme without even knowing it. Amy Thomas (author of Virtual Girl) reviewed it, and I imagine she has no idea how much her more or less approving assessment still stings a bit, even years later. She called it "schmaltzy, but moving."

That critique, of course, was in a way a put down, and I knew it. It stung because the world doesn’t value schmaltzy (Etymology: Yiddish shmalts, literally, rendered fat, from Middle High German smalz; akin to Old High German smelzan to melt -- 1 : sentimental or florid music or art 2 : SENTIMENTALITY). [livejournal.com profile] pameladean was absolutely right: the world doesn't value the heart of flesh, and always seeks to replace it with the heart of stone. Look at [livejournal.com profile] awatson’s last paragraph: I don't know the poster of the original, and I've got nothing against them. I'm glad they see the world the way they do, and honestly, I hope their version comes true. I'd be lying if I said that I didn't feel briefly warmed and uplifted by their account, but then my natural bitterness got the better of me.

[livejournal.com profile] magdalene1 saw the couple and viewed them one way: He’s tall, with brown hair and thick glasses with black frames. She’s short and curvy, with thick curly brown hair. [livejournal.com profile] awatson took the very same description and saw it with different eyes, with a jeering dismissive undertone: He's lanky, with slightly greasy brown hair and thick glasses with dated looking frames. She's short and fat, with frizzy brown hair. [livejournal.com profile] awatson is seeing them with the bitter glass that the demons hold that W.B. Yeats talks about in "The Two Trees." (See the essay at the end of that link).

Is the romantic love that [livejournal.com profile] magdalene1 thought she witnessed at that coffeeshop a myth? In the great conversation between Tolkien and Lewis that led to Lewis’s conversion to Christianity, Lewis said that the story of beautiful story of Christ dying to redeem the world was a myth, and myths were merely lies, though lies "breathed in silver."

No, they are not, Tolkien replied. They are truth.

Of course romantic love is a myth. But in that myth is a truth that can comfort you when you are alone and discover that you need not be alone because someone loves you. It can keep you warm at night, it can save your life from despair, though the world will always jeer and mock and predict that everything will end up horribly. We live in a cynical age, but I’m going to continue to resist that cynicism.

Let the world sneer. I’m going to continue trying to nurture my heart of flesh and resist the heart of stone.

Edited to add: Oh dear, oh dear. I see that I've set off somewhat of a comment kerfluffle. I've been thinking about this all day and marshalling my thoughts. I have to leave work now. Rather than replying to comments on this entry piecemeal, I'll do a new entry when I get home, and perhaps this time I'll explain myself a bit more clearly.

Influences

Feb. 2nd, 2003 11:50 pm
pegkerr: (Default)
[livejournal.com profile] dragonpaws remarked in a comment to yesterday's entry that she noticed the similarities between this proposed ice palace book and [livejournal.com profile] pameladean's Tam Lin. Here is part of my reply to her.
Anyway, the parallel you noticed between this new book of mine and Pamela's Tam Lin is not news to me at all; in fact, I can assure you that it was the primary thing on my mind yesterday as I was cleaning out the garage. I am also fretting about the similarities to Patricia Wrede and Caroline Stevermer's Sorcery and Cecelia, with the epicyclical spell. This, too, is probably not a coincidence; Pat is another one of my mentors. Yes, as in Pamela's book I'm planning to have the man get the woman pregnant (perhaps deliberately, using magic, despite her birth control?), and then have a magical use for the pregnancy. As in P&C's book, I'm planning to have the villain suck away the life force of someone to whom he is related, to extend his own life (although in my story, rather than finding someone to whom he is related, the villain makes a baby). As I said, I am a little worried about it but think it will be okay. Will have to think of how to spin it a little differently, emphasizing themes of emphemerality/immortality, and parenthood, both deliberately accepted and deliberately rejected.
This is getting back to something I spoke about in earlier entries: gravitational pulls of other stories. I do tend to think about this a lot. Of course, many stories have elements that other stories also use. Of course, the greatest writers did not hesitate to get ideas from others' works (i.e., Shakespeare). I have an extremely retentive memory for this sort of thing, which can be both a blessing and a curse for a working author. I have frequently astonished [livejournal.com profile] kijjohnson by referring in a conversation to a snippet from a book I haven't read for fifteen years. I'll go over to the shelf, page through it, and quickly find the thing I've remembered, frequently word-for-word. As I said, this can be very useful, but on the other hand, writing my own stuff continually sets off "echoes" of other stuff I've read. I'm continually thinking, as I write, about where to draw the line, so that if what I write reminds me of something I've read, I try to draw it out in a different direction, give it a different spin, etc. How different does it have to be? Depends on how common the idea is. This is an issue both at the micro-writing and macro-writing level. I've written a sentence and thought, "Ok, I know where I got that image or the combination of those particular three words together. It's from that scene in that book from ________. Is it okay to use it? Can I think of something different to say that will accomplish a similar effect, if that's the effect I want? Are three words acceptable but five unacceptable? I remember arguing with myself about this over three words in a short story: a woman is horribly embarrassed when confronted by a naked man, and says something in a "high, emaciated coloratura." I wrote that down, and remembered . . . oh . . . I remember where I read that. But it's the perfect phrase for what I'm trying to get across. What to do?

I used it. I'm still not sure whether it was the right thing to do, but over the years, I've come to think it was probably a mistake to do so. And so I've become even more conservative over this, the longer I've been writing. If I were writing that story today, I probably would have tried to think of a different three words instead.

Anyway, nobody's sued me yet.

P.
pegkerr: (Default)
I left work at 12:30 and arrived at the con. As I mentioned yesterday, I had been crabbily wondering whether I would enjoy it, but the first day was a great success.

Day One )

Cheers,
Peg

Ouch!

Oct. 31st, 2002 06:51 am
pegkerr: (Default)
I did my new Firm tape this morning: Firm: Strong Heart. It has the toughest legs section I've ever seen.

I am going to have the legs of a goddess!

If they don't fall off first.

Peg

("I conjure you by Rosiland's quivering thigh/and the regions that there adjacent lie" Two points to the first person (except for [livejournal.com profile] pameladean, of course, who probably would know it immediately without even trying) to recognize the source of that quotation!)

Later: Corrected. I realize I didn't have the quotation quite right. Here it is again (sorry!):

" [I conjure you]. . .by her fine foot, straight leg and quivering thigh / And the demesnes that there adjacent lie . . . Boy, you better believe I thought about those quivering thighs this morning when I was doing the abductor lifts. Whew!
pegkerr: (Default)
I checked my user page today and did a little happy dance, when I saw a new addition to my "Friends Of" list and thereby discovered that [livejournal.com profile] pameladean now has a LiveJournal account. Pamela writes wonderful books, including some of my very favorite fantasy novels of all time. I had the great pleasure of being in a Shakespeare reading group with her for a number of years, and she has been a very kind writing mentor to me. (And I should also not fail to mention that she gave me the best recipe for molasses gingerbread that I have ever tasted.)

I suspect she might not want a fuss made to welcome her. Tough cookies, Pamela. This is my journal, and I'm going to do it anyway. I'm glad to be able to be the first to say, welcome to LiveJournal, [livejournal.com profile] pameladean. So glad to have you with us.

Cheers,
Peg

Mentoring

Jul. 9th, 2002 10:06 pm
pegkerr: (Default)
A new milestone today: another writer contacted me to ask whether I'd be willing to take a look at her novel manuscript and write a blurb for it for her editor. I sent off a message to say, sure, send it along and I'll take a look.

I was pleased to be asked, but also, admittedly, a little startled. [livejournal.com profile] kijjohnson and I laugh about it sometimes: it's hard to believe that people are turning to us to mentor them, because we still feel like neophytes, barely wet behind the ears, trying to figure things out ourselves. And then she'll mention another course she's going to teach on writing, and I mention a manuscript I'm vetting for someone else. Or else I'm at a convention, answering questions for people who want to write, and I look around and have to admit, okay, I probably do know more and have more experience than anyone else in the room. When on earth did that happen?

I feel very fortunate in that I've had some fantastic mentors at quite a few crucial stages of my career. Minneapolis is really a hotbed for nurturing writers, particularly sf/fantasy writers. Locals include (or have included in the past) Eleanor Arnason, Bruce Bethke, Joel Rosenberg, Ruth Berman, Patricia C. Wrede, Caroline Stevemer, Phil Jennings, Lois McMaster Bujold, Steven K. Brust, Emma Bull, Will Shetterly, Kara Dalkey, John M. Ford, Kij Johnson, Carolyn Ives Gilman, Terry Garey, Katya Reiman, Gordon Dickson, John Sladek (and there's also Laurie Winter, John Calvin Rezmerski, and Neil Gaiman who live in cities pretty close by). We have excellent genre bookstores and thriving fan community and conventions.

Kij and I vividly remember a lunch we had with Eleanor Arnason and Patricia C. Hodgell at a Minicon convention years ago. All four of us went to lunch, and Kij and I asked these two established pros anything we could think of that we wanted to know. We were both so touched by the generosity they showed to us by answering our questions. Both Kij and I had toyed with the idea of writing, but this was the first time that someone who knew the ropes took notice of us, treated us with serious consideration and let us know, by giving us their attention and answering questions: yes, this is possible, and you could do this if you want to do it.

I kept going to convention panels and buttonholing authors, asking questions. Tell me about how you first became published. Tell me about writing your first novel. And they kept answering. My questions became less naive as I learned more and more, but I was always astonished at how generous so many people were in answering questions that they must have heard many times before. Several of them spelled it out for me: "We're answering these questions for you because others answered them for us. Someday you'll mentor writers, too, and you'll do the same."

And you know? They're right: I am answering questions for writers now. I do enjoy it, not only because I'm very aware of my pay-it-forward debt, but because it's a great deal of fun--particularly when you're lucky enough to find a very good writer at the beginning of his or her career who's really starting to shine, and then you get to bask in the reflected glow of a new writer's accomplishments. (Say, for example, Lyda Morehouse).

I've gotten lots of bits of excellent advice from mentors over the years, but here are a few of the insights that really have made a difference for me, that I try to pass on myself to new writers now whenever I answer questions.

Tim Powers was one of my teachers at Clarion, and he told me:

"If one person tells you that a story doesn't work although you still believe in it, remember that this simply means it doesn't mean for that person. All you have to do is find the person it does work for, preferably an editor with a checkbook. Once you have the check in hand, the bank will cash it, even if the editor at a different magazine rejected the story. Be willing to take a second look at your work and maybe make revisions, but don't let one rejection make you give up on a story if you really believe in it."

Tim also told us:

"Remember to remain a decent human being as you try to learn to be a writer. Don't approach people with only the thought 'What good will knowing you do for my career?' Spend time with people, at conventions and anywhere else, because you enjoy their company, not because you want to make use of them. Don't snub people just because, say, they're unpublished writers and you want to be seen as a pro. And don't badmouth people--this field is too small, and it will always get back to the person."

Kim Stanley Robinson, also one of my Clarion teachers, told us something very simple, but this has always really stuck with me, too:

"How do you write? Learn about different techniques and then do whatever works for you. As a teacher, I can tell you what works for me, but you may have a totally different technique, and that's okay."

And now that I've given you those priceless pieces of wisdom that it's taken me years to cull, I'm off to work on Lois' manuscript a bit more and then to bed.

Cheers,
Peg
pegkerr: (Loving books)
This short story I'm "working" on has been going nowhere fast, and now the research library books are due. I have about six library books on wildfire management that I have to schlepp back to the library. I hope that I can renew them--I've already renewed them once. If I can't, if I have to return them, I can't write the story. I haven't taken notes, because I really prefer to write with my research books right on my lap. But this story requires so much background that I don't feel comfortable just winging it.

*Sigh* I hope they'll let me renew them again. After investing so much time reading all these damn books, I don't want to simply give up.

Reading list for the month:

Finder by Emma Bull
Elsewhere by Will Shetterly
Nevernever by Will Shetterly
Chimera by Will Shetterly
Dogland by Will Shetterly

I'm embarrassed to admit that these were all first time reads. I finally tackled 'em because Will and Emma were the guests of honor at Minicon, and I didn't want to be on panels with them without reading their books. I don't know why I've stalled so long on reading them--it was sort of an odd fluke of jealousy, if anything. I loved Emma's War for the Oaks so much that I almost couldn't bear to read anything else of hers, for fear it wouldn't have been so perfect. And that feeling sort of slopped over to Will. How irrational is that?



Juniper, Gentian and Rosemary by Pamela Dean
A Murderous Yarn by Monica Ferris. This is one of Mary Monica Pulver's pen name. I was surprised at how uneven this one was, considering how many books Mary has written; she kind of messed up the point of view at the end. Well, she's still an author I'll pick up every book she's written. I do admire how hard she works.

Hellroaring by Peter M. Leschak (research). Quite interesting.
Firefighter's Handbook on Wildland Firefighting: Strategies, Tactics and Safety by William C. Teie. (research)
Fire on the Mountain by John MacLean (Research) Only skimmed in parts.

Huh. Kind of a light month for me.

Cheers,
Peg

Birthday

Apr. 28th, 2002 02:05 pm
pegkerr: (Default)
This morning, with much whispering and giggling, the girls came and rousted their Daddy out of bed. I barely registered this as unusual before drifting back to sleep (Sunday's Rob's designated day to sleep in) They all trooped back about fifteen minutes later proudly bearing a breakfast-in-bed tray for me (my usual breakfast cereal, garnished with strawberries). And then they all sat around on the bed and watched me eat it. They had brought the newspaper, but it felt too odd to read it, with two little girls staring at me, rather like cats staring up at someone opening a can of catfood.

I just finished (again) Juniper, Gentian and Rosemary by Pamela Dean. I was crossly wishing for an annotated version--and just found one on the Internet! Squee! There's an annotated Tam Lin, too. I also found the ballad the story is based upon ("Riddles Wisely Expounded").

Huh. Maybe I should try writing a book from a ballad. I've already written one from a fairy tale. Stealing somebody else's plot seems to help.

Pamela Dean is one of my favorite authors, and Tam Lin (especially) is one of my favorite books. I know that some readers may find the style unrealistic--and some find it downright annoying--all those quotations, all those allusions! Although ordinarily my taste runs to a much more transparent style, I adore Pamela's. It's the sort of writing I'm not too confident I can do myself, but I enjoy watching Pamela do it.

Another thing, rather odd: when I read Pamela's books, I hear Pamela's voice as the central character's voice. Perhaps that's because both Gentian (the protagonist of Juniper, Gentian and Rosemary) and Janet (the protagonist of Tam Lin) remind me a lot of Pamela--certainly they have her habit of sprinkling poetic allusions through their conversations. I was in a Shakespeare reading group with Pamela for over five years, and it was a feast of wild delight. Other members included Mike Ford (John M. Ford is his publishing name), Elise Matthesen, Patricia C. Wrede, Lois McMaster Bujold, and aside from the joys of Shakespeare, the conversations were fascinating, although I often felt totally intellectually outclassed. There aren't many groups where I'm aware that I'm less well-read than the people around me, and I think it was good for me.

But I was speaking of hearing the author's voice in one's head when reading certain books. Pamela is one, Eleanor Arnason is another (with that dry, drawling Icelandic wit). And Steve Brust.

Oddly enough, however, I never hear Lois' voice when I read any of her Miles Vorkosigan books. Miles has his own very distinctive voice, quite different from Lois's.

I wonder if people who know me hear my voice when they read my characters.

Profile

pegkerr: (Default)
pegkerr

July 2026

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Peg Kerr, Author

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags