danielmedic

About that "thank you to veterans" thing ...

Every November 11th, a whole bunch of people get thanked. I'm not exactly sure how I feel about that.

Every social networking page is filled with posts. Martial poems, particularly "In Flanders Field," get quoted over and over again. Car and furniture dealerships hold sales, announced with bunches of old-fashioned waving-flag banners.

This is not in and of itself a bad thing. I don't mind, and I doubt many of my fellow veterans do either. And yet ...

At the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month of 1918, the guns fell silent on the Western Front. All wars are bad, and some are very bad; the line that had been more or less fixed in place since late 1914 may very well have been the worst ever. The US was, truth be told, a bit player in this; Americans suffered and died, but the scale of the suffering and death which Europe had inflicted on itself is still beyond comprehension. The great feats of endurance and valor which define the best parts of American military history -- Valley Forge, Fort McHenry, Chapultapec, Shiloh, Gettysburg, Belleau Wood, Bastogne, Guadalcanal, Pusan, Chosin, Khe Sanh, Wadi al-Batin -- drop them in the middle of the Somme or Verdun, and they vanish. They become background noise, minor skirmishes forgotten in the main event.

I served honorably, and most of the time with pleasure, for ten years; as an infantryman and as a medic, as a soldier and as an airman, in peace and in war, at home and overseas. My war was bad, because all wars are bad, and it left me with memories I can't shake and will never be able to, memories I could well do without. I can say, without breaking my arm patting myself on the back, that medics and infantrymen are unique in their understanding of what war actually is. Infantrymen do the killing, close-up, whites-of-their-eyes, and most of the dying as well; and medics pick up the pieces, patch up the wounded and comfort the dying, fighting a personal war which is the same in every time and place regardless of which war they're in, which group of evil old men in the halls of power has created the chaos into which terrified kids must descend.

By comparison to the best day in, say, 1916, my war was a walk in the park.

Only for a period of a few months during my entire term of service, between my arrival in Europe and the final disintegration of the USSR, did I actually believe I was defending the Constitution of the United States of America against enemies foreign and domestic. The rest of the time? It was a job. A pretty good job, mostly, sometimes a very difficult job, and occasionally a very dangerous job. A job, not a calling, nonetheless.

And when I did go to war, it was for no noble cause. Not a bad cause, you understand, but not an especially good one either. It was because evil old men far away had decided that once again, it was time for young men and women to die. Like it usually is. 1914-1918 is barely within living memory now, but that lesson should stay with us always.

So, speaking for my fellow veterans: we gladly accept your thanks, and you're welcome. Speaking for myself: you're welcome, but please always try to remember what you're thanking us for.

(x-posted to danielmedic)
  • Current Mood
    thoughtful thoughtful
danielmedic

It's easy to write a letter to the Governor ...

... and here's why you should.

Dear Gov. Ritter,

It is my understanding that the Secretary of State's office has recently conducted an unprecendented purge of registered voters, removing fully one-fifth of voters registered in Colorado from the rolls. These voters are overwhelmingly low-income and minority voters who are likely to vote Democratic. With Colorado being a "swing state" in an election year, the timing of this move makes it difficult to believe that it is not a partisan move by Republican Secretary of State Coffman to move the state's electoral votes into the Republican column in November. As a Democrat, a veteran, a Coloradoan, and an American, I urge you to ensure that the upcoming election gives a fair voice to all the voters of our great state.

sincerely,
Daniel Dvorkin


http://www.colorado.gov/apps/oit/g…

It's not just Colorado, of course; Florida, Ohio, and New Mexico are other states notably undergoing such purges. Now, what do all these states have in common? Hmmm, let me think ...

(x-posted to danielmedic and gothnation)
  • Current Mood
    angry angry
Reading

Hello everyone

I just found your group and warmly embrace the ideas behind your group. I hope you have been treated well here in the online world.

While you would be hard-pressed to find someone more against the current war being raged in Iraq, and while I was against attacking Afghanistan after 9/11, I am one of those cliches...against the war but for the troops.

Back in the beginning of this year, a friend of mine and I joined together to form a group, she inspired by the fact that she has many friends and loved ones in the military, me inspired by several documentaries about the war in Iraq which showed the bleakness of serving there. Our group, Operation Bag of Home, is working to send small, pocket-sized bags filled with small toiletries and other necessities to our men and women serving overseas.

Those of you who are vets could likely give us excellent advice on what is most desired as signs of home that could fit into a bag that could be carried in a pocket. Right now we are trying to collect things like travel-sized toothpaste, wet ones, and powdered beverages.

If this sounds at all interesting to you, please visit operationboh.

I hope this post is okay...if not please feel free to delete.

Thank you so much!
danielmedic

The letter I just wrote to the Obama campaign

Dear Sen. Obama,

I am writing to urge you to support, rather than distance yourself from, Gen. Wesley Clark and the criticisms he has recently made of Sen. McCain's qualifications and experience. Gen. Clark's remarks were absolutely accurate and contain an important truth that the American people need to understand in this election: surviving being held as a POW, and the rest of Sen. McCain's military service, does not qualify him to be President. No matter what he may have done as a pilot, as a politician he has made the wrong choices over and over again on foreign and defense policy and on veterans' issues -- the very areas where his experience should be supposedly be most useful.

Gen. Clark spoke truth, and is courageously standing by his statements in the face of withering criticism. He would be a great choice for a Vice Presidential candidate for your campaign. At the very least, you should see the justice in his remarks and support conveying this message to voters.

As a veteran, a Democrat, and an American, I support both you and Gen. Clark in your continuing hard work to make America a country we can again be proud of. Please do not miss this opportunity to work together.

sincerely,

Daniel Dvorkin

...

A number of other vets -- mostly much younger than me, and correspondingly blunter -- have some words to say here.

(x-posted to danielmedic)
  • Current Mood
    thoughtful thoughtful

IVAW detained at Fort Bragg

Brownies Will Get You Five to Ten

A Boondocks Chapter Christmas at Fort Bragg
By Jason Hurd
http://www.ivaw.org/node/2230

On the morning of December 17, 2007, Steve Casey and I awoke bright and early at the Quaker House in Fayetteville, North Carolina. Steve and I had driven nearly three hundred miles from our home-base in Asheville, North Carolina to distribute holiday gift bags to the wonderful servicewomen and men stationed at our nation's busiest military post--Fort Bragg. Our friends and supporters in Asheville stuffed nearly three hundred small lunch bags full of holiday cards, chocolates, cookies and home-made brownies. The gift bags had a humble feel to them: brown paper lunch sacks with the tops folded down, green and red ribbons, a copy of our newsletter Sit-Rep stapled to the outside and a small sticker that said, "To: A Warrior, From: IVAW." Our mission was to ensure that these bags--each made with love and kindness--got into the hands of our deserving soldiers.

Read onCollapse )

Songs About War

Brickfish has a really cool music competition going on now for songs about war. Some of the entries are really good- they’re definitely worth checking out. Lets show some love for these artists who are supporting our troops! Don’t miss “Freedom Ain’t Free” and “She’s an American Soldier”; you can listen here http://www.brickfish.com/politics/… 

IVAW membership criteria?

So, there's been a long running debate within IVAW of who should get to be a member, basically. Last I heard, it was open to anyone in the service on any date after 9/11/01 (i.e., serving in the War of Terror), regardless of combat service. Some folks wanted Gulf War 1 vets included. Some say it should be open to ALL vets of the last 17 years, since we were waging just as vicious an economic war plus bombing campaigns during Clinton's reign. Some say it should be limited as it has been, to reinforce the notion that what they're saying about the genocide in Iraq is current, and not the concerns of 1990. The idea of "associate membership" for other vets has been bandied about.

I know that this gets brought up within IVAW every year at the Veterans for Peace convention. Does anyone know if the criteria changed this year?
  • Current Music
    Johnny Cash - "Folsom Prison Blues"

(no subject)

I'm teaching a class this coming semester on rhetoric, so I've been finding essays to include.

So I'm reading through one of the books I got and can take essays from for class (entitled Writing Without Formulas, by William H. Thelin), and I find an article entitled "The Top Censored News Stories of 2005-2006," by Peter Phillips, Trish Boreta, and Project Censored. So I start reading it, and I get to section 8 and a chill falls over me...

8. Pentagon Exempt from FOIA

The Department of Defense has been granted exemption from the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). In December 2005, Congress passed the 2006 Defense Authorization Act, which renders Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) "operational files" fully immune to FOIA requests, the main mechanism by which watchdog groups, journalists, and individuals can access federal documents. Of particular concern to critics of the Defense Authorization Act is the DIA's new right to thwart access to files that may reveal human-rights violations tied to ongoing "counterterrorism" efforts.

The rule could, for instance, frustrate the work of the ACLU and other organizations that have relied on FOIA to uncover more than 30,000 documents on the U.S. military's involvement in the torture and mistreatment of foreign detainees in Afghanistan, Guantanamo Bay, and Iraq--including the Abu Ghraib scanda.

Several key documents have surfaced in the advocacy organization's expansive research originate from DIA files, including a 2004 memorandum containing evidence that U.S. military interrogators brutalized detainees in Baghdad, as well as a report describing the abuse of Iraqi detainees as violations of international human rights law.

According to Jameel Jaffer, and ACLU attorney involved in the ongoing torture investigations, "If the Defense Intelligence Agency can rely on exception or exemption from the FOIA, then documents such as those that we obtained this last time will not become public at all." The end result of such an exemption, he told TheNewStandard.com, is that "abuse is much more likely to take place, because there's not public oversight of Defense Intelligence Agency activity."

Jaffer added that because the DIA conducts investigations relating to other national-security-related agencies, documents covered by the exemption could contain critical evidence of how other parts of the military operate as well.

The Newspaper Association of America informs that due to lobbying efforts of the Sunshine in Government Initiative and other open-government advocates, congressional negotiators imposed an unprecedented two-year "sunset" date on the Pentagon's FOIA exemption, ending December 2007.

Source: "Pentagon Seeks Greater Immunity from Freedom of Information," by Michelle Chen. TheNewStandard.com. May 6, 2005.


So in four and a half months, the Pentagon will have license to do anything it wants without fear of scrutiny by the public. Am I the only one this terrifies?

Why has there not been coverage of this??

x-posting to liberal_bias

EDIT: I read this wrong. Apparently they will no longer be exempt as of December 2007, but the fact that there has been little media coverage of their exemption in the YEAR AND A HALF that it's been in place really concerns me. Not to mention there's no guarantee that the exemption won't be extended.