Free Will
Choices
The illusionary self, which is the feeling of “I am a person”, imagines itself to have the ability of free will.
Even if you adapt the belief or a certain philosophy, that there is no free will, the self will still not quite be able to get it.
This is because, like the sense of separation, the illusion of free will is a fundamental characteristic of the self.
“I decide!”
You might try to challenge this statement with examples of when you clearly made a choice in your past.
"It was ME who decided to do that!"
The truth is, that everything just is as it is.
The process of making an apparent choice, the experience of “I could have done something else instead” also is what arises in awareness.
The self imagines parallel realities in which another decision would have lead to other events and so on.
It is able to dream up the story of different possible choices in the past and future and constantly evaluates if it could have done something differently or what its next choice will be.
The famous “What if?”.
The truth is that everything that arises is what it is and can not or could not have been any different.
Purposely spilling your drink to prove me wrong here would also just be as it is ;)
Something that arises.
No choice made, nobody there to make a choice.
“So does enlightenment provide free will then?”
No, sorry.
What is difficult (better say impossible) for the self to grasp is, that enlightenment has nothing to do with whatever person seemingly is the enlightened one.
The person sitting here writing this and thinking about this stuff, how to express it in a good way etc. is also just an experience arising in awareness.
There is nobody here doing anything.
Of course, in practical language, I decide what to eat for dinner etc.
What enlightenment “does” is that the illusion of the self is dropped.
That which remains is just pure awareness. “Oneness” if you will.
The content of awareness, “made of” awareness is still the same visually etc.
This knowing, of course also permeates the body/mind-structure because the self was such a strong factor in behaviour. But it doesn’t even mean there has to be anything different about practical matters of everyday life. Conditioning of the body/mind, reactions of apparent separation and so on still arise. Thoughts that “pull you in”, it can all arise in awareness.
There seems to be the belief in some people, that the enlightened “person” wouldn’t want to eat, sleep, breath, earn money or enjoy a good movie anymore. This is of course just a nice fiction for the mind of enlightenment as something exotic or a personal experience that makes you resistant to cold weather.
It changes nothing and everything.
To make sense of this paradox you have to go there. This is where the mind (itself arising in awareness) can not go.
Luntrus
Minimal Spirituality
The illusionary self, which is the feeling of “I am a person”, imagines itself to have the ability of free will.
Even if you adapt the belief or a certain philosophy, that there is no free will, the self will still not quite be able to get it.
This is because, like the sense of separation, the illusion of free will is a fundamental characteristic of the self.
“I decide!”
You might try to challenge this statement with examples of when you clearly made a choice in your past.
"It was ME who decided to do that!"
The truth is, that everything just is as it is.
The process of making an apparent choice, the experience of “I could have done something else instead” also is what arises in awareness.
The self imagines parallel realities in which another decision would have lead to other events and so on.
It is able to dream up the story of different possible choices in the past and future and constantly evaluates if it could have done something differently or what its next choice will be.
The famous “What if?”.
The truth is that everything that arises is what it is and can not or could not have been any different.
Purposely spilling your drink to prove me wrong here would also just be as it is ;)
Something that arises.
No choice made, nobody there to make a choice.
“So does enlightenment provide free will then?”
No, sorry.
What is difficult (better say impossible) for the self to grasp is, that enlightenment has nothing to do with whatever person seemingly is the enlightened one.
The person sitting here writing this and thinking about this stuff, how to express it in a good way etc. is also just an experience arising in awareness.
There is nobody here doing anything.
Of course, in practical language, I decide what to eat for dinner etc.
What enlightenment “does” is that the illusion of the self is dropped.
That which remains is just pure awareness. “Oneness” if you will.
The content of awareness, “made of” awareness is still the same visually etc.
This knowing, of course also permeates the body/mind-structure because the self was such a strong factor in behaviour. But it doesn’t even mean there has to be anything different about practical matters of everyday life. Conditioning of the body/mind, reactions of apparent separation and so on still arise. Thoughts that “pull you in”, it can all arise in awareness.
There seems to be the belief in some people, that the enlightened “person” wouldn’t want to eat, sleep, breath, earn money or enjoy a good movie anymore. This is of course just a nice fiction for the mind of enlightenment as something exotic or a personal experience that makes you resistant to cold weather.
It changes nothing and everything.
To make sense of this paradox you have to go there. This is where the mind (itself arising in awareness) can not go.
Luntrus
Minimal Spirituality


![carl-jung[1] carl-jung[1]](https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/fluffyblanket/5117054/170520/170520_100.png)
![165779_600[1] 165779_600[1]](https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/fluffyblanket/5117054/169261/169261_100.jpg)
