Avatar

NighttheWing

@nightthewing

Here, queer, and ready to party. above the age of 21

I think basically it would be really pleasant to find a bug type pokemon, like, a Wurmple, eating up your garden and say hey excuse me, these plants are really important to me and I would prefer you didn't eat them, do you want to come with me to the garden center and we can pick out something just for you? And you'd offer your hand and it would sniff and go wurm wurm! And crawl up onto your shoulder and you'd look at plants together and then when you go to the checkout a lady says you and your partner Wurmple make quite a cute pair and you start to say oh I don't really know this Wurmple we just met today and then you and the Wurmple look at each other and decide you both had a lot of fun together and that it would love to be your friend.

And then basically just this happens with different puppies and kitties and teacups and stuff like every few days.

Okay, let's talk about kids and needles.

Because under the post about giving minors the right to medically consent, people are spreading a ton of misinformation on this - largely because they just do not question the stuff they just assume are "normal". Which here is: "kids are all afraid of needles and therefore if we let them consent or not to medical proceedures, they would just not consent and not get vaccinations, because needles hurt".

And, look. Here is the thing: no, needles do not actually hurt a whole lot. And while, yes, certain procedures that involve being stabbed by a needle hurt more if you are younger for a bunch of reasons... that is actually not the main reason children fear needles. Because, again: the pain is not that bad. And most kids, especially young kids, whose motor skills are still developing, usually will have a bunch more hurting scratches, bruises and the like at any given moment than there will be pain from the needle.

No, from what research can tell, the main reason kids are afraid of needles, is more that for many of them needle procedures are very traumatizing. And that is largely because of the consent issue.

Imagine you are a person who is still pretty darn new to that whole human thing. So for one, yes, your brain is actually not that great in understanding what pain is dangerous and what pain is a safe limit of pain. So yes, someone intentionally hurting you (like with a needle) is really kinda scary. But then there is also the thing where this person hurting you is not telling you why they are doing. The people who you normally trust with keeping you safe (your family) is betraying you, by just holding you down and scolding you for crying over it. Or maybe it is not your family, but some strange nurse who is holding you. And while you are scared, because someone is intentionally hurting you, while someone else is restricting you, the adults around you are telling you, that your emotional reaction to this is actually bad and you are wrong for reacting that way. They might in fact lie to you and tell you that something that is insanely scary to you is "not that bad", instead of just understanding that it is super scary to you. And that is then what you start to expect whenever you see a doctor prepare a needle: people holding you down, hurting you without reason, and telling you that you are wrong for being upset, actively gaslighting you.

We have research on this. And this research is pretty clear: most kids are actually somewhat okay with needles, if you inform them why you are doing it, allow for them to have their emotions, talk to them about their emotions, and allow for them to set at least some conditions.

And frankly, I hate how many people just accept the framing of "kids are naturally afraid of this because it hurts". Like, folks, I know y'all are fucking Americans and that in your culture it is kinda normalized to like put kids into like some sort of fortified hamsterball to stop them from like doing typical kids stuff. But... let me tell you: if you do not do that, kids will actually very regularly engage in dangerous play that they know will often end up in injuries that are going to hurt. And, no, they are not to dumb to understand that. The kids know that this is what might happen because of their play. They actually just take the risk. Yes, they will cry if they get hurt, because - again - their nervous system is still calibrating how it relates to pain. But they will likely do that thing again and again. I can tell you: I fell down a tree so often during my childhood, and I still climbed it. Again and again. So did most kids I knew. Like, fuck, we lived next to a forest. We played "Tarzan", and tried to go along paths without touching the ground. And we fell. A lot. And we still did it.

It is not the fear of pain that makes kids afraid of doctors. It is the fear of the associated force, and gaslighting.

The thing is, if you don't explain it, how are kids meant to give informed consent? That's why a woman named Mary Jenner created The Butterfly Pig, which sells medical play toys to families with medically sensitive kids and children's hospitals, so kids can play about the stuff that's going to happen or watch their caregivers show them. For this reason in particular, there's a syringe toy to simulate injections, and it includes a Buzzy toy, which imitates a real Buzzy that vibrates and is cold so injections don't hurt as much, and the real Buzzy is used in over 5,000 hospitals and clinics globally.

YES YES YES YES

look up “child life specialists”

— the profession is fully dedicated to supporting kids and families in the health care setting, and a significant portion of that is educating kids (in a way they can understand, developmentally) and making plans With them to make the experience easier!

And there is SO MUCH research out there! If you explain to kids what’s going on, they need less anesthesia, get better quicker, and have less medical trauma— which leads to a willingness to accept preventative care in the future!

Child Life has been leading the charge in this area for decades, and it’s so awesome to see it becoming more mainstream knowledge!

When Drugs Became Available

Have you ever been writing some historical fiction and wondered "hey, I wonder if my characters would have been able to pop an ibuprofen in 1977?" Well, you're in luck, because this post is all about when common medications became available:

  • Acetaminophen: 1950
  • Albuterol: 1969 (UK) 1982 (US)
  • Allopurinol: 1966
  • Alprazolam: 1981
  • Amitriptyline: 1961
  • Amlodipine: 1990
  • Amoxicilin: 1972
  • Amphetamine/Dextroamphetamine (together as Adderall): 1996
  • Apixiban: 2012
  • Aripiprazole: 2002
  • Aspirin (first NSAID): 1899
  • Azidothymidine (first antiviral): 1987
  • Barbital (first barbiturate): 1903
  • Bupropion: 1985
  • Buspirone: 1986
  • Calcium Carbonate (TUMS): 1930
  • Captopril (first ACE inhibitor): 1981
  • Chlordiazepoxide (first benzodiazepine): 1960
  • Chlorothiazide (first thiazide diuretic): 1957
  • Chlorpromazine (first antipsychotic): 1952
  • Cyclobenzeprine: 1977
  • Diphenhydramine: 1946
  • Furosemide: 1959
  • Fluoxetine (first SSRI): 1988
  • Gabapentin: 1993
  • Glipizide: 1984
  • Hydrochlorothiazide: 1959
  • Ibuprofen: 1969 (UK) 1974 (US)
  • Insulin: 1923 (though many types of insulins would become available over the next century)
  • Imipramine (first tricyclic antidepressant): 1959
  • Iproniazid (first antidepressant (MAOI)): 1952
  • Levothyroxine: 1927 (though desiccated pork thyroid was used for the same reasons as early as 1890)
  • Lisinopril: 1987
  • Lithium: 1949
  • Losartan (first ARB): 1995
  • Lovastatin (first statin): 1987
  • Naproxen: 1976 (Rx) 1990 (OTC)
  • Nitrogen Mustard (first chemotherapy agent): early 1940's
  • Methotrexate: 1947
  • Methylphenidate: 1954
  • Metformin: 1957 (France) 1995 (US)
  • Metoprolol: 1978
  • Montelukast: 1998
  • Morphine: early 1800's
  • Omeprazole: 1989
  • Penicillin: 1945
  • Phenbezamine (first antihistamine): 1942
  • Prednisone: 1955
  • Propranolol (first beta blocker): 1965 (UK) 1967 (US)
  • Sertraline: 1990
  • Spironolactone: 1959
  • Sulfanilamide (first modern antibiotic): 1935
  • Tolbutamide (first oral anti-diabetic drug): 1956
  • Tramadol: 1977 (Germany) 1995 (US)
  • Trazodone: 1981
  • Valacyclovir: 1995
  • Verapamil (first calcium channel blocker): 1964
  • Warfarin: 1954
  • Zopiclone (first "Z-drug"): 1986

Someone asked for this list in date order, so here it is!

  • Morphine: early 1800's
  • Aspirin (first NSAID): 1899
  • Barbital (first barbiturate): 1903
  • Insulin: 1923 (though many types of insulins would become available over the next century)
  • Levothyroxine: 1927 (though desiccated pork thyroid was used for the same reasons as early as 1890)
  • Calcium Carbonate (TUMS): 1930
  • Sulfanilamide (first modern antibiotic): 1935
  • Nitrogen Mustard (first chemotherapy agent): early 1940's
  • Phenbezamine (first antihistamine): 1942
  • Penicillin: 1945
  • Diphenhydramine: 1946
  • Methotrexate: 1947
  • Lithium: 1949
  • Acetaminophen: 1950
  • Chlorpromazine (first antipsychotic): 1952
  • Iproniazid (first antidepressant (MAOI)): 1952
  • Methylphenidate: 1954
  • Warfarin: 1954
  • Prednisone: 1955
  • Tolbutamide (first oral anti-diabetic drug): 1956
  • Chlorothiazide (first thiazide diuretic): 1957
  • Metformin: 1957 (France) 1995 (US)
  • Furosemide: 1959
  • Hydrochlorothiazide: 1959
  • Spironolactone: 1959
  • Imipramine (first tricyclic antidepressant): 1959
  • Chlordiazepoxide (first benzodiazepine): 1960
  • Amitriptyline: 1961
  • Verapamil (first calcium channel blocker): 1964
  • Propranolol (first beta blocker): 1965 (UK) 1967 (US)
  • Allopurinol: 1966
  • Albuterol: 1969 (UK) 1982 (US)
  • Ibuprofen: 1969 (UK) 1974 (US)
  • Amoxicilin: 1972
  • Naproxen: 1976 (Rx) 1990 (OTC)
  • Cyclobenzeprine: 1977
  • Tramadol: 1977 (Germany) 1995 (US)
  • Metoprolol: 1978
  • Captopril (first ACE inhibitor): 1981
  • Trazodone: 1981
  • Alprazolam: 1981
  • Glipizide: 1984
  • Bupropion: 1985
  • Buspirone: 1986
  • Zopiclone (first "Z-drug"): 1986
  • Lovastatin (first statin): 1987
  • Azidothymidine (first antiviral): 1987
  • Lisinopril: 1987
  • Fluoxetine (first SSRI): 1988
  • Omeprazole: 1989
  • Amlodipine: 1990
  • Sertraline: 1990
  • Gabapentin: 1993
  • Losartan (first ARB): 1995
  • Valacyclovir: 1995
  • Amphetamine/Dextroamphetamine (together as Adderall): 1996
  • Montelukast: 1998
  • Aripiprazole: 2002
  • Apixiban: 2012

I already keep track of a lot of this stuff but hey, it's useful.

Avatar
Reblogged

the way "forgive" is motte-and-bailey'd to mean both "actively condone someone's past behavior and choose to keep them in your life" and just Not Punishing Them is so jokerfying and indicative of this punitive-ass culture.

do i think you should be allowed to cut someone off and continue to understand what they did was wrong? do i think you're allowed to be angry and frustrated and upset with them? yes obviously. but i also think that doeant give you carte blanche to go on and ruin their life.

but whenever a discussion on punitive "justice" comes up people see "maybe abusers shouldnt be killed or indefinitely tortured for their transgressions" a hundred people incredulously respond "oh you want abused people to forgive their abusers?". and well, that depends on what you mean by forgive.

if you think anything less than like, constant punishment and indefinite social exile is "letting abusers off easy" then you are going to hurt a lot of people.

Avatar
Reblogged

no, you cannot report the most disgusting and shockingly vile fanfic on ao3. ao3 will not do anything about the fic, because ao3 explicitly allows it to exist on their platform.

being completely and utterly against censorship is the main core principle of ao3.

ao3 was created specifically to host and give a platform to fics that were banned on other platforms.

therefore the most disgusting and shockingly vile fanfic you find is the exact reason why ao3 was created in the first place.

"Rent needs to get paid and food needs to be put on the table whether we're on our periods or not, so what's a sex worker to do?"

An article about how sex workers keep working during our periods and why we often need to. Sex workers are frequently left out of conversations about period poverty and unsafe menstrual products, yet we're one of the groups most incentivized to take risks with our menstrual health so we can keep working!

P.S. This article uses gender neutral language intentionally, including trans men and non-binary people who sell sex and also have periods. As a trans hooker and the guy who wrote this, I'd appreciate people not defaulting to assuming sex workers dealing with these issues are all women!

Avatar
frogmunist-deactivated20190724

A man is driving down the road and breaks down near a monastery. He goes to the monastery, knocks on the door, and says, “My car broke down. Do you think I could stay the night?” The monks graciously accept him, feed him dinner, even fix his car. As the man tries to fall asleep, he hears a strange sound. The next morning, he asks the monks what the sound was, but they say, “We can’t tell you. You’re not a monk.” The man is disappointed but thanks them anyway and goes about his merry way. Some years later, the same man breaks down in front of the same monastery. The monks accept him, feed him, even fix his car. That night, he hears the same strange noise that he had heard years earlier. The next morning, he asks what it is, but the monks reply, “We can’t tell you. You’re not a monk.” The man says, “All right, all right. I’m *dying* to know. If the only way I can find out what that sound was is to become a monk, how do I become a monk?” The monks reply, “You must travel the earth and tell us how many blades of grass there are and the exact number of sand pebbles. When you find these numbers, you will become a monk.” The man sets about his task. Forty-five years later, he returns and knocks on the door of the monastery. He says, “I have traveled the earth and have found what you have asked for. There are 145,236,284,232 blades of grass and 231,281,219,999,129,382 sand pebbles on the earth.” The monks reply, “Congratulations. You are now a monk. We shall now show you the way to the sound.” The monks lead the man to a wooden door, where the head monk says, “The sound is right behind that door.” The man reaches for the knob, but the door is locked. He says, “Real funny. May I have the key?” The monks give him the key, and he opens the door. Behind the wooden door is another door made of stone. The man demands the key to the stone door. The monks give him the key, and he opens it, only to find a door made of ruby. He demands another key from the monks, who provide it. Behind that door is another door, this one made of sapphire. So it went until the man had gone through doors of emerald, silver, topaz, and amethyst. Finally, the monks say, “This is the last key to the last door.” The man is relieved to no end. He unlocks the door, turns the knob, and behind that door he is amazed to find the source of that strange sound. But I can’t tell you what it is because you’re not a monk

BWAHAHAHAHAH. 

the way i learned this, it was always told through spoken word. And you’d do the door thing for ages. AGES. literally just making up any old material. ‘behind the foam door is a door made of spinach’ that kind of shit. Go on until whoever is listening has already begged you to stop and has now gone on to pleading, clutching your shirt on their knees pleading. And when you finally said the last line? People went fucking nuts Like there was a good chance of just getting the teeth knocked out of you after telling that joke.

A friend of mine did that shit for 30 minutes on a camp once. The entire fucking bus just exploded in anger when she finished. It was a fucking massacre. 

ACCIDENTALLY LEFT MY MACERATED APPLE SYRUP ON THE STOVE AND IT CARAMELIZED I GUESS?

it was super thick and dark and golden and bubbly so i took it off the heat. happy accident.

tastes delicious so good. idk what to do with it though

thank you for your recommendation! with brief consideration, it has been disregarded.

Avatar
Reblogged

it's almost funny that bill hates stan's jokes for being bad, instead of trying to insult him by pointing out that this was the only way he felt any sort of love for ages

but there's also the fact that stan's family does love his terrible jokes

Avatar
internet-sentences

Werner herzog

when I first saw this quote I was like 'that's either david lynch or hideo kojima' and then read the source and realised it's the third and last of their species

here's some other great bits from the interview