Nationalist Eugenics

Eugenicists are uncommon, so there is no way that eugenicists will be able to convert any existing country or state/province into a 'eugenic nation'. There is one viable option though, which is to pool the resources of eugenicists so as to establish an intentional community in which the people practice eugenics.

The largest group of people that are considering living in an intentional community is the yahoogroup http://groups.yahoo.com/group/INTE… . I advise all eugenicists to join it.

It was a bit on the belligerent side.

Consider for a moment that civilization can head in the wrong direction in spite of abundant comforts. Great societies are created by great people; individuals who have an innate sight and sensitivity towards the complexities of organizing human beings co-operatively en masse. However, as is common in history, when the qualities of a populace cease to conflate with its founding forefathers, it begins a state of decline. Such societies can be sustained for a while by intelligent operators, but lacking the integral nature of civilization builders, they eventually fail. Considering this, it seems advantageous for innate qualities equal to or better than that of the source to be encouraged, embraced and rewarded while discouraging and banishing qualities which don’t stand up.

Natural selection can increase or decrease the frequency of an allele (alternative version of a gene created by mutation) depending on the demands of the environment. Mutation, or change in hereditary material, happens randomly in nature and is the force which creates allele and subsequently fuels the process of evolution. However, not all mutation is “good” or beneficial to the species, and the way with which selection affects the species (or: which allele are best suited for the environment and thus passed on) determines their survival in the long term. Selection that weeds out harmful alleles is called “negative” selection. What increases the frequency of helpful alleles is “positive” selection.

Eugenics is the process of directing evolutionary selection within a lineage for a specific purpose. It decides which traits are beneficial and selects appropriate individuals to breed together in order to produce a population specific in design. Contrary to popular belief, this sort of population cannot be achieved through education, at least not conceivably beyond a generation or two, as it is innate intelligence which created civilization in the first place, and without it, civilization wanes into a state of depression and ignorance as is found today until it eventually disappears altogether. Thus eugenics practices both “positive” and “negative” selection.

When applying eugenics to humans, there are some things to consider. Of course, it’s obvious that the traits selected as worthy are beneficial to both mankind and its environment as a whole, lest the population become self-destructive (i.e. damage its environment irrecompensively) and die out, effectively failing the experiment. Therefore the criterion is selected based upon the integrally good qualities of humankind: high moral character, physical strength and beauty, aesthetic sensibility and intelligence.

It is at this point, the process of isolating the appropriate traits among a population, where nationalism is implemented. In order for a eugenic system, where hereditary qualities are specifically selected, to be effective its components must be limited in gene flow exposure. Gene flow is where organisms of a distantly related population interbreed, introducing new allele into the gene pool. Eugenics must bar gene flow so that new mutations aren’t constantly being introduced into the system, thus continually bringing the entire process to ground zero.

What nationalism is: an understanding that society is both an organic entity with components (us), designed selectively to function within society through the evolution of culture, that operate best in harmony and also a component to a greater whole -- the universe. It is the system which understands that civilizations are not distinguished by political concerns alone, targets the internal qualities that truly identify us and works to give each group enough space that it can serve its orders best. What nationalism isn’t: a degree of the same order as patriotism or racism, as nationalism existed before these things and will exist long after them.

When nationalism is adopted, appropriately allowing each autonomous group to decide the course of their fate (opposed to inter-nationalism, wherein the fate of all is decided by a handful of nations -- more specifically: not the nations themselves but their corrupt leaders – who politically and militarily powerful enough to manipulate international law to their advantage), the process of eugenics can begin. Only at this point will we be poised to curb the idiotic dimwitting that has befallen the modern world: where morons are in charge because they simply outnumber the intelligent and enlightened, and in turn ruin everything for everyone. Forever and ever, amen.

http://community.livejournal.com/n…

Watching the duality of both a new crop of nationalist organizations worldwide and their failure can make any observer of history want to throw hands to the sky in discomprehension. Like all things in life, if we remove the chaff generated by human emotions and fears, we can see what logically needs to be done and create a new world in its image.

Clearly nationalism is part of any necessary future society because autonomy for each ethnic-cultural group is necessary for them to exist; ethnic groups that mix with others become dissolved and turn into "new" things that invariably become the same old thing, or the cultureless random mix of novelties and businesses. Healthy people are proud of their heritage and will defend it. This is why nationalism is on the rise: thanks to globalism, we now see the threat of becoming generic mixed populations and being bred into a uniform grey.

However, nationalists are like anyone else, and in a time of so much emotional reaction, they also become reactionary. Instead of looking at the simple truth, they bluster on with speeches and threats of violence, turning most people away from their ideas. Who wants another world war? Or, for that matter, another totalitarian state? (While it's clear that the "freedom" of the modern West leads to decadence and needs to be in some ways limited, this can be accomplished without midnight raids by masked commandos and secret files on every citizen.)

( Read more...Collapse )

[link]

Total detentions of aliens attempting to sneak across the Mexican border have plummeted an unimaginable 21% in the first 10 days of June compared to the same period last year. This drop occurs at a time when enforcement efforts are at a recent high, due to political concerns, and reflects a precipitous drop in total attempted border crossings. According to an Associated Press report, Jorge Vazquez, a director of “Grupo Beta,” an agency funded by the Mexican government and that works to aid and abet Mexicans seeking to enter the United States illegally, his agents have seen a similar drop in traffic on his side of the border.

The shocking drop-off in human smuggling is attributed to one factor: the arrival of the National Guard on the border. That’s quite an accomplishment for just 55 guardsmen, who did not even arrive until June 3 and are working entirely in support roles with the Border Patrol. What has really stemmed the tide is just the idea that troops are coming to the border—a fact that has found widespread exaggeration in the Mexican media.

[link]

[You hear one-world sympathizers and Mexican nationalists say again and again that walls don’t work; the border cannot be effectively secured, they moan. It appears they’re wrong or, more likely, just lying. Were our orders saner we would have ALL National Guard (those who guard the nation) at home securing the borders instead of in distant lands, dying to secure political and corporate special interests.]

1. Human intelligence is largely hereditary.

2. Civilization depends totally upon innate intelligence. Without innate intelligence, civilization would never have been created. When intelligence declines, so does civilization.

3. The higher the level of civilization, the better off the population. Civilization is not an either-or proposition. Rather, it's a matter of degree, and each degree, up or down, affects the well-being of every citizen.

4. At the present time, we are evolving to become less intelligent with each new generation. Why is this happening? Simple: the least-intelligent people are having the most children.

5. Unless we halt or reverse this trend, our civilization will invariably decline. Any decline in civilization produces a commensurate increase in the collective "misery quotient."

Logic and scientific evidence stand behind each statement listed above.

http://www.eugenics.net/papers/cas…

When we look at the second problem of white societies unacknowledged by white power groups, we get into a more complex situation: what is the ideal design for a society? If we thought clearly, we might say:

(a) Leadership by the capable: genius intelligence, conscientious application, empathic understanding but given toward seeing the whole picture and not the conflicting demands of individuals.

(b) Does not trash its environment through reckless industry and overpopulation (the primary threat to our environment is land overuse, as with sufficient natural land to absorb, process and counter our pollution through oxygen production, it can deal with us just fine -- yet when we occupy almost all of the land that can be civilized, whether with farms or factories, we destroy that nurturing support structure).

(c) Has healthy values that place creativity, sobriety, sexual selectivity and marital fidelity, heroism and transcendence above temporary pleasures such as physical satiation and seizure of power or acting out of emotional desires (revenge, hatred, desire to be loved through popularity).

(d) Gives to each of us a place where we can contribute meaningfully, and returns the rest of our time to us. The average person works 8-10 hours and commutes nearly two per day; this leaves 4-6 hours for paying bills, haggling with service providers, fixing up the house, spending time with family, spending time with friends, etc., per day. Weekends for most people consist of a day for errands and a day for rest, with one or two nights of recreation in between. This amounts to too little time for a quietude of contemplation and devotion to family and friends and society in a meaningful way; instead, we get token applications of each and, because people are constantly exhausted, lots of television watching.

(e) Produces higher culture, learning, arts and heroes.

(f) Rewards those of a higher nature, and ushers the criminal, mentally defective, stupid, ugly and petty-minded toward evolutionary extinction.

White societies lack all of these things, and have now for centuries. Until we fix these roots of the problem, all of the symptoms will re-invent themselves even if some genocidal master plan is implemented to clear out all non-whites (which would be a shame, seeing how most of them were invited here by white people as labor, and in innocence believe they can find a "better" life here, although what they really mean by that is greater wealth and technology). Our problem is that our people do not agree on a sensible course of action, together, because they are too busy with individual pursuits of pleasure, wealth, comfort. We are divided and surrounded by (white) people of low quality. White power organizations ignore that reality, and prefer to send us on a wild goose chase after non-whites, so that white privilege can take the place of actually fixing our society. Not only does this ignore the problem, but by offering a placebo solution, perpetuates it.

http://anus.com/zine/articles/proz…

Blair, the Metropolitan police commissioner, has signed off a report by his force’s traffic unit which shows that black people account for 46% of all arrests generated by new automatic numberplate recognition (ANPR) cameras.

Although ANPR technology is impartial, the disproportionate number of blacks being arrested has prompted the Met to investigate.

The arrests have been broken down by ethnicity in a report sent last month to the Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA), to which the force is accountable.

It reveals that between April 2005 and January this year the units generated 2,023 arrests. Of these 923 were black suspects, while 738 (36%) came from white backgrounds. Asians accounted for just over 9% of arrests.
...
However, statistics from the 2001 census show that the highest black population in any borough is no greater than about 25%. The proportion of black people across the capital as a whole is about 11%.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/artic…

POULSBO - The words are ugly and vicious, and they sent a chill through a local festival.

Racist hate mail sent to Poulsbo is directed at a young African-American woman who is "Miss Viking Fest".

Campbell loves being this year's Miss Viking Fest. The yearly Poulsbo festival is a celebration of all things Scandinavian. In spite of its heritage, no one was surprised when the articulate, pretty young woman won this year's competition.

"You don't have to be of Viking stock," says Kathi Foresee, Viking Fest secretary, "I don't even know that all of us that work on the organization are of Viking stock," she laughs.

But then came the hate mail. At least a dozen racist e-mails - all from outside of Poulsbo - asked festival organizers how they could let a black woman represent a Viking Festival.

http://www.komotv.com/news/story.a…

They say the words are ugly, vicious and racist, but what did these e-mails actually say? The article skirts around this issue in hopes that its readers are sensitive enough to the cry of racism that they wont ask questions. The local news paraphrased one of the messages as saying, "Why should this Negro be queen of a festival honoring mostly blond-haired, blue-eyed White people?"

My question is this: is that really such an outrageous question to ask? In a festival celebrating Viking heritage, how appropriate is it to crown a black woman as queen? And if they really dont care about the involvement of Viking stock, why call it a celebration of all things Scandinavian in the first place?

Lets say the shoe was on the other foot, and a white woman was crowned queen of an Afro-American festival. Would it be unreasonable for blacks proud of their heritage to call that inappropriate? Would it be ugly, vicious or racist, or is this simply an example of the oversensitivity of modern day political correctness; that Scandinavian whites are not allowed to ask questions, complain or be upset when a festival supposedly honoring and celebrating their culture and heritage misrepresents them?

1. End Envy. When everyone in society competes for money alone, envy and resentment run high and so does sleight of hand behavior. Let's stop the rat race. In a healthy culture, every job is important and given its place, and no one is left to rot at the bottom of the competitive heap except blatant incompetents.

2. Reduce pollution and urban blight. We're all scrabbling toward the top of the pile so we don't get left in a ghetto. But running away to the suburbs no longer protects us from deranged urban dwellers. A solution is to fix our cities and o put some people in jail for life if all they do is destroy things.

3. Kick our oil dependency. Oil is our heroin, our crack, our meth. We need a certain amount of it to run our economy. But do we really need individual cars, especially since they don't help us outrun the mess of the city? Do we really need all of these products? We can do just as well with less, and in fact be happier.

4. Support diversity. To have diversity, you need to have distinct ethnic groups. If you try to combine these groups, they'll fight for their own right to exist as a group and cause the ethnic warfare common to multicultural society. Let the ethnic groups separate and stop viewing such separation as a taboo "racism."

5. Don't try to hide different abilities. Billy is a genius, but Mary is a world-class athlete. We get embarrassed for both of these kids because they can't do something the other can. Let's end that charade. We're all different and we each have a place in the world. We don't need to be "equal" to be OK, and trying to force "equality" causes mayhem.

6. Allow people to live according to chosen values, even if they seem grotesque to us. In the west, our newspapers tell us that Muslims are primitive, women-abusing, tribal societies. But there is no science or philosophy that tells us reliability that such lifestyles are "bad." Tolerate difference.

7. Stop the war on drugs. Some people are gonna take 'em, and some are gonna drink to excess. Just keep them away from the kids and when they're observed screwing up on the job, fire them. We cannot afford the violence and police militarization of the war on drugs.

8. Forget the war between the sexes. If being equal means we gotta fight and have the 50% chance of divorce for every marriage we have, forget it. Let's respect each other for what we are and try to get along with more respect. "Equality" might be an illusory goal, since we've each got different equipment, inside and out, but respect and compassion are eternal.

9. Reverence. We're so busy chasing the holy dollar we've forgotten what it is to love life. Ancient monks in secluded monasteries saw intense concentration on tasks and appreciation of life as a form of prayer. Maybe this kind of soul stillness and inner beauty is missing in our lives, and we need to bring it back.

10. Open-mindedness. "Tolerance" implies not liking something, but putting up with it. Instead, we should try to understand that we each have different paths, and there is no ordained single route to glory. There are some things that are a good idea for everyone, but you have to do it for yourself. Be open-minded in the original meaning -- we know the goal, but there's more than one way to get there.

This message brought to you by AAAWL:
http://www.corrupt.org/