So this is the future
I'm sure many of you have noticed, as I have, how inescapable these amazing new "films" (or, as fans call them, "movies") have become in the media recently. I suppose every generation has to come up with something different that the oldsters didn't have! Anyway, I thought it was time I gave one of these "movies" a try. And I have to say I was impressed. It's all very different from the one I remember seeing in my own youth, a minute long show of a train arriving at a station. No, this was in colour, and you could hear people speak. Even more amazing, there were pictures up there on the screen of things I'm sure have never existed in real life! I've got to say, these technology people really know their stuff.
But I have to say I was quite disappointed by what actually happened in this "film". It was some sort of sci-fi thing called "Dredd", and for every one of the five minutes I spent looking at it, people were shooting and attacking each other. That's all that happened in every bit of it I saw. People fighting. And I'm told young people today watch these films all the time. Is this sort of violence obsessed medium really what we want our children to be spending their time with? (To be fair, my son tells me that there are different kinds of "movie". Apparently one sort is called a "biopick" - because the hero kills people with an icepick, and "biopick" sounds more sci-fi than "icepick" - and there's even a kind meant for women, the "romcoms". But I can't imagine any woman I know wanting to sit down and watch people killing each other for two hours, so I think those films can't get many customers. And why do they call them "romcoms" anyway? I guess it must have something to do with zombies?)
As I'm sure you'll all agree, this "new medium" really doesn't seem like it matches up to good old books. Certainly great authors like Norman Mailer never wrote about people fighting wars and punching each other! But, as a professional journalist, I thought I should be careful to be completely fair. So I read a book based on the "script" for one of these things. After all, once the words have been put down in print, anything that's wrong with them can't be blamed on problems with the technology, now can it? And I have to say I was disappointed again. "Rambo: First Blood Part II - The Novelization" was simply one of the worst books I have ever read. Not only were the characters ludicrous, but the prose style was absolutely terrible. Looks like these "screenplay creators" don't know nearly as much about writing as proper book authors, I'm afraid.
So, while my hat's certainly off to the Lumiere Brothers for all the impressive gimmicks they've added to their cameras over the last few years (or is it the Lumiere Sons now?), I think I have to say: the sooner this fad disappears, the better. I'm sure you're all join me in looking forward to the day when my son and all his friends have grown up enough to abandon these childish, unpleasant "movies", and settle down with a good book.
(Search and replace "film" with "game" and "book" with "film", then publish in any newspaper in the land.)
(Brought to you by a sense of mild exasperation, and the inspiring example of Sophie Houlden's Can Art be Games?)
But I have to say I was quite disappointed by what actually happened in this "film". It was some sort of sci-fi thing called "Dredd", and for every one of the five minutes I spent looking at it, people were shooting and attacking each other. That's all that happened in every bit of it I saw. People fighting. And I'm told young people today watch these films all the time. Is this sort of violence obsessed medium really what we want our children to be spending their time with? (To be fair, my son tells me that there are different kinds of "movie". Apparently one sort is called a "biopick" - because the hero kills people with an icepick, and "biopick" sounds more sci-fi than "icepick" - and there's even a kind meant for women, the "romcoms". But I can't imagine any woman I know wanting to sit down and watch people killing each other for two hours, so I think those films can't get many customers. And why do they call them "romcoms" anyway? I guess it must have something to do with zombies?)
As I'm sure you'll all agree, this "new medium" really doesn't seem like it matches up to good old books. Certainly great authors like Norman Mailer never wrote about people fighting wars and punching each other! But, as a professional journalist, I thought I should be careful to be completely fair. So I read a book based on the "script" for one of these things. After all, once the words have been put down in print, anything that's wrong with them can't be blamed on problems with the technology, now can it? And I have to say I was disappointed again. "Rambo: First Blood Part II - The Novelization" was simply one of the worst books I have ever read. Not only were the characters ludicrous, but the prose style was absolutely terrible. Looks like these "screenplay creators" don't know nearly as much about writing as proper book authors, I'm afraid.
So, while my hat's certainly off to the Lumiere Brothers for all the impressive gimmicks they've added to their cameras over the last few years (or is it the Lumiere Sons now?), I think I have to say: the sooner this fad disappears, the better. I'm sure you're all join me in looking forward to the day when my son and all his friends have grown up enough to abandon these childish, unpleasant "movies", and settle down with a good book.
(Search and replace "film" with "game" and "book" with "film", then publish in any newspaper in the land.)
(Brought to you by a sense of mild exasperation, and the inspiring example of Sophie Houlden's Can Art be Games?)