black swan

Another boring post about creeping FASCISM - (my most important): Part 1

This discussion is very heady - however, it spares you a tonne of facile examples of what can be seen as creeping fascism. For instance: Dick Cheney, Xi, etc. It spares you the whole tedious subjects of economic inflation, banksters, and politicians. However, it is a rare case of thematic coherence, and it's focus is more upon law, ethics and history, starting with a recent incident of a girl being beaten-up in seattle, while security guards looked on passively...

Collapse )
  • Current Music
    NPR news
black swan

When Corporations Play 'Monopoly,' Consumers Lose

When Corporations Play 'Monopoly,' Consumers Lose

Robert Reich wants you to know about the biggest economic problem you’ve heard almost nothing about—the Monopolization of America—and how it affects what you pay for food and other consumer products.

In his latest video on Facebook, released Sunday and already seen by more than 500,000 viewers, Reich says America’s monopoly problem stems from the “hidden upward redistribution of money and power from the majority of Americans to corporate executives and wealthy shareholders.”

The only way to fix it? Revive antitrust enforcement.

Reich recently visited with Missouri farmers, whose profits have been disappearing. He explains:

Monsanto alone owns the key genetic traits to more than 90 percent of the soybeans planted by farmers in the U.S. and 80 percent of the corn, which means Monsanto can charge farmers much higher prices. And farmers are getting squeezed from the other side too, because the food processors they sell their products to are also consolidating into mega companies that have so much market power they can cut the prices they pay to farmers. This doesn’t mean lower food prices to you, it means more profits to the monopolists.

Reich also takes his video viewers to a grocery store, to point out how it looks as if you have a lot of choices as you cruise the aisles. But when you take a closer look, you see monopolies everywhere.

Did you know that 82 percent of beef packing, 85 percent of soybean processing, 63 percent of pork packing and 53 percent of chicken processing are all controlled by just 10 huge corporations—Tyson, Kraft, Dean Foods, Pepsico, Smithfield, ConAgra Foods, Nestle, General Mills, ABInBev and JBS?

Video ici

Reich also points to products like toothpaste, sunglasses, plastic hangers and cat food. And yep, monopolies there, too.

Bottom line? Massive consolidation has created just a handful of giant corporations that don’t have to compete because they control the marketplace. And that means, as Reich puts it, “they can jack up your prices.”

Which industries are playing “Monopoly?” Big Pharma, health insurers, online travel, cable and internet service are just a few of the industries highlighted by Reich as being able to charge you more because they have little or no competition.

And it’s not just consumers who get gouged—lack of competition keeps wages low, too.

“Workers with less choice of who to work for have a harder time getting a raise,” Reich says. “When local labor markets are dominated by one major big box retailer or one grocery chain, for example, those firms essentially set wage rates for the area.”

As if price-gouging and shafting workers weren’t bad enough, these mega corporations also have a lot of political power. Reich says antitrust laws are supposed to promote fair competition for the benefit of consumers. It was during the Gilded Age that progressive reformer President Teddy Roosevelt successfully used the Sherman Antitrust Act to dismantle trusts, including the Northern Securities Company and Standard Oil.

For the next 65 years, things got better for consumers thanks to the Sherman Antitrust Act. But all that changed in the 1980s when Robert Bork wrote “The Antitrust Paradox,” which criticized the antitrust law and proclaimed trusts to be just fine. Bork’s philosophy was aligned with the conservative Chicago School of Economics and embraced by the Reagan administration.

Since then, Reich says, “antitrust has all but disappeared,” rushing in the new economy, characterized by declining competition and unprecedented consolidation.

“Big techs, sweeping patents, standard platforms, fleets of lawyers to litigate against potential rivals and armies of lobbyists have created formidable barriers to new entrance,” Reich says. As a result, the rate at which new businesses are formed has been slashed by nearly half.

“Big Tech along with the drug, insurance, agriculture and financial giants dominates both are economy and our politics,” Reich says. “It is time to revive antitrust.”

What does this mean for the future of our food? Well, the $62.5-billion Bayer acquisition of Monsanto, now that the European Commission and U.S. Department of Justice have given the green light, is certainly a big step in the wrong direction.

“The monopolistic and criminal histories of Monsanto and Bayer have been well documented,” said Ronnie Cummins, international director of Organic Consumers Association. “Allowing these two companies to merge into the world’s largest seed and pesticide company spells disaster for consumers, for the environment and for farmers who will now have even fewer choices.”

But as Cummins affirms, “The industrial chemical agriculture model—where factory farms and GMO monoculture crops have produced unhealthy food while poisoning the environment and creating a nightmare of superweeds and superbugs—is not the future of food. We will continue to promote an alternative organic regenerative model that truly nourishes the world while restoring the ecosystem."

Check out Regeneration International’s website to learn how you can join the regeneration movement.

Organic Consumers Association is a nonprofit consumer advocacy and grassroots organization. Keep up-to-date with OCA’s news and alerts by signing up for our newsletter.

crazy /eek - yammer

Chase those crazy Bank-heads...



After all the OCCUPY movement's drive to shake up the inequality game, here we have a candidate running who represents all that is bad about the zombie wealth-suckers at the top, Mitt Romney. It's surreal, and tragically sad. Not to say that Obama is an angel - I'm sure many of you are aware of the hidden flaws of Obama. And to to say Obama doesn't also know how to lie like Romney. He does. I think Obama has been gleefully anticipating running against Willard Rob-me, because he was already aware of his corrupt tax record. And the Dems set up a strategy ahead of time, including Harry Reid's present polite offensive. But the dogged vehemence with which many on the right attack Obama for calling out Romney for not doing what should NORMALLY be done, simply release his tax records, has been insane. And this is after demanding Obama's birth certificate and school records... (and John Kerry's wives tax records, and TED KENNEDY's tax records) - acting like Romney has a divine right not to disclose his tax returns. Like the Democratic "attack" is GROSSLY UNFAIR AND EVEN DEMONIC. Ha ha... Insane... This is the way the Senators and elites acted before the collapse of the Roman Empire: absolutism, irrationality, personal vendetta elevated into the public commons, refusal to compromise, or even respect the rules of the game, lax as they are. Calling the repeal of TEMPORARY tax cuts for the rich, "AN INCREASE IN TAXES." All through this, Romney is dancing a ridiculous dance of lies, as if he is immune to the realities of OUR world - our votes... He reminds me of the Banksters. Flat-out, believe-yourself, random skirting attention-deficit BALDFACE LYING. Well, of course, someone like that should certainly be trusted about his hidden taxes. Of COURSE we are even considering him for president. Such a plummitting downward spiral of our public philosophy! To bald-face lie, means to lie without even having a beard to hide one's facial expressions. Like a bankster - you know the type. They walk a life along an endlessly nervous line, they lose their hair by the time they are thirty years old. That's why I think Romney has virtual hair - or else he has had it so easy, he has never had to worry a BIT about the looming consequences of his lies, in the same way a sociopath never concerns himself about the disapprovals of society. (Beardless liars with a full head of hair, therefore, are the worst ever). But I think it would be right to lump Romney, along with much of Obama's cabinet, into one category, called, "Baldfaced Banksters," or, "Crazy Baldheads".... Basically, they are the MONEY FUNDAMENTALISTS. We need to Chase them out of town!

"You LIE!!!: WALL STREET JOURNAL criticizes Romney Lies

''Banksters as Corrupt 'Fundamentalists'''