6
$\begingroup$

Suppose we have a smooth complete intersection of hypersurfaces with degrees $d_1,...,d_r$ in some $\mathbb{P}^N$. This should be a surface and in certain situations a surface of general type. What can one say about the Hodge diamond? Or what is its Grothendieck group ?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So are you assuming $r = N - 2$ since you say you get a surface? $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 15, 2013 at 0:23
  • $\begingroup$ a useful online tool for small cases: pbelmans.ncag.info/cohomology-tables $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 8, 2024 at 19:12

3 Answers 3

10
$\begingroup$

This question is addressed in Appendix I of Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry. Let $V_n^{d_1, \ldots, d_r}$ denote the complete intersection of $r$ generic hypersurfaces of degrees $d_1, \ldots d_r$ in $\mathbb{P}^{n + r}$. Let

$$ \chi_y(V_n^{d_1,\ldots, d_r}) = \sum_{p,q \geq 0} (-1)^qh^{p,q}(V_n^{d_1,\ldots, d_r})y^p = \sum_{p \geq 0} \chi^p(V_n^{d_1,\ldots, d_r})y^p $$

where $y$ is an indeterminate and $h^{p,q}$ are the Hodge numbers and

$$ \chi^p(V_n^{d_1,\ldots, d_r}) = \sum_{q \geq 0} (-1)^qh^{p,q}(V_n^{d_1,\ldots, d_r}). $$

Then Theorem 22.1.1 of the above reference says that

$$ \sum_{n \geq 0} \chi_y(V_n^{d_1,\ldots, d_r}) z^{n+r} = \frac{1}{(1-z)(1 + zy)}\prod_{i=1}^r\frac{(1 + zy)^{d_i}-(1-z)^{d_i}}{(1+zy)^{d_i}+y(1-z)^{d_i}}. $$

This let's you compute the numbers $\chi^p(V_n^{d_1,\ldots, d_r})$ which aren't exactly the Hodge numbers. However, the next Theorem makes it possible to find the actual Hodge numbers from this data. Thereom 22.1.2 in the same section says that

$$ h^{p,q}(V_n^{d_1,\ldots, d_r}) = \delta_{p,q} \enspace \enspace \text{for} \enspace \enspace p + q \neq n, $$

$$ \chi^p(V_n^{d_1,\ldots, d_r}) = (-1)^{n-p}h^{p,n-p}(V_n^{d_1,\ldots, d_r}) + (-1)^p \enspace \enspace \text{for} \enspace \enspace 2p \neq n $$

and

$$ \chi^m(V_n^{d_1,\ldots, d_r}) = (-1)^mh^{m,m}(V_n^{d_1,\ldots, d_r}) \enspace \enspace \text{for} \enspace \enspace 2m = n $$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ So, this computation based on Lefschetz hyperplane theorem? $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 15, 2013 at 2:30
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. In particular, the computations of theorem 22.1.2 use Lefschetz hyperplane theorem. The argument for packaging them together into the generating function of theorem 22.1.1 uses Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch to relate that generating function to the Chern classes. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 15, 2013 at 2:55
1
$\begingroup$

The Grothendieck group/ring tensor $Q$ is the same as the Severi-Chow group/ring tensor $Q$, which varies a lot when you vary your hypersurfaces. This happens already in the case of algebraic surfaces in $P^3$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Can you give an explicit example of this phenomena? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 12, 2017 at 23:04
  • $\begingroup$ Well, take a look of surfaces of degree 4 in P^3. Configurations of curves on them can be vastly different (for example, some of them contain lines, (which are rigid -- can not be moved), while most surfaces of degree 4 have no lines on them. Thus their Picard (= Neron-Severi, in this case) lattices will be diffenet, and thus their K-groups are different. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 16, 2019 at 3:40
1
$\begingroup$

I have written a small (Python) program which computes Hodge numbers of hypersurfaces;

It is very easy to modify to work for complete intersections, too.

It contains references (to Hirzebruch and Deligne) in the comments section, and also a couple of examples in dimensions two and three:

Link, at the GitLab

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.