(no subject)
http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/1…
So first trailer for the new holmes movie. I really really like it. Various forums Im on have been loving it or slating it in equal measure.
The "Purists" hate it, which I suppose is to be expected - however this movie is not based on the books but based on the recent reworking in comics.
However I read all the holmes books in my early teens - I went through them like lightening I loved them so much. I saw different aspects of Holmes in the books to what I saw in the rathbone and brett adaptations I watched with Gran. He was a fighter and a thinker and a dreamer and a manic depressive and a horrid sexist.
He was as capeable of using his fists to get out of a situation as he was using his mind although he said he abhored violence. He had no real regard for the law in respect of himself thinking he was outside of it while applying it to rigidly to others. He lived in chaos often filth and of course there was his addiction, he was rude, often purpously socially inept and not alwasy the sauave well turned out gent TV often represents.
People are complaining that there is to much action too much comedy and not enought plot - well possibly - but I always think its hard to tell that from a short trailer. After all trailers are edited to show many different things, and always made to appeal to the widest possible audience including the action movie fans and the pirates of the caribean fans, and the special effects fans, and the lowest common denomonator, not just the purisits or the homes fans. Movies get made to make money at the end of the day. I doubt enough purists would see a pure holmes film to make it worth studios while, and havent we had some amazing "purist" adaptations in the past on the TV? Like the Star Trek reworking maybe it is time to bring Holmes to a new generation?
So first trailer for the new holmes movie. I really really like it. Various forums Im on have been loving it or slating it in equal measure.
The "Purists" hate it, which I suppose is to be expected - however this movie is not based on the books but based on the recent reworking in comics.
However I read all the holmes books in my early teens - I went through them like lightening I loved them so much. I saw different aspects of Holmes in the books to what I saw in the rathbone and brett adaptations I watched with Gran. He was a fighter and a thinker and a dreamer and a manic depressive and a horrid sexist.
He was as capeable of using his fists to get out of a situation as he was using his mind although he said he abhored violence. He had no real regard for the law in respect of himself thinking he was outside of it while applying it to rigidly to others. He lived in chaos often filth and of course there was his addiction, he was rude, often purpously socially inept and not alwasy the sauave well turned out gent TV often represents.
People are complaining that there is to much action too much comedy and not enought plot - well possibly - but I always think its hard to tell that from a short trailer. After all trailers are edited to show many different things, and always made to appeal to the widest possible audience including the action movie fans and the pirates of the caribean fans, and the special effects fans, and the lowest common denomonator, not just the purisits or the homes fans. Movies get made to make money at the end of the day. I doubt enough purists would see a pure holmes film to make it worth studios while, and havent we had some amazing "purist" adaptations in the past on the TV? Like the Star Trek reworking maybe it is time to bring Holmes to a new generation?
