(no subject)
May. 28th, 2004 10:08 amHelpful reminder: Blogging is public; blogging is publication. (via How Appealing.)
(no subject)
Apr. 26th, 2004 07:41 pmOnly following
bryant's orders:
Invent a memory of me and post it in the comments. It can be anything you want, so long as it's something that's never happened. Feel free to post this to your journal and see what people would like to remember of you, only the universe failed to cooperate in making it happen so they had to make it up instead. Or don't - no reason to feel like you have to clutter your journal just because you want to participate on someone else's.
Invent a memory of me and post it in the comments. It can be anything you want, so long as it's something that's never happened. Feel free to post this to your journal and see what people would like to remember of you, only the universe failed to cooperate in making it happen so they had to make it up instead. Or don't - no reason to feel like you have to clutter your journal just because you want to participate on someone else's.
(no subject)
Apr. 7th, 2004 01:34 pmSo apparently (and this is likely old news to everyone but me), I, Robot has nothing at all to do with I, Robot. They just welded the name (and the three laws) onto an unrelated screenplay once they acquired the rights. So, yeah.
But seeing that the title of the screenplay was originally "Hardwired" reminds me to mention how disappointed I was to learn that the film Hard Boiled was not based on Hard Boiled.
Although I'm happy to see live action adaptations of comics, most of my favorite comics are ones that I really don't want to see adapted to the screen. Some of them (Ronin, Night Force), it's because I don't trust anyone to do a good job, in part because I'm pretty sure doing a good job would necessarily mean creating a box-office flop. (I would dearly love for someone to prove me wrong, though.) Others, though, I just don't think belong on film - it's impossible for me to imagine enjoying a Dr. Strange film, or a Thor film, or a Cerebus film. (Did I just admit to really liking Dr. Strange, Thor and Cerebus? Oops.*) I've been wracking my brain since Spider-Man came out, trying to think of a property that I'm just dying to see on film; something that's actually plausible, if not likely. I think I've settled on Hard Boiled, now that I've been reminded. Sure, the plot isn't what's awesome about Hard Boiled; the movie would be totally different from the comic. But I think a successful Hollywood movie could be made that would still be recognizably Hard Boiled. And man, wouldn't that be awesome?
* - I also really dug ROM and Dial H for Hero, but I've outgrown those.
But seeing that the title of the screenplay was originally "Hardwired" reminds me to mention how disappointed I was to learn that the film Hard Boiled was not based on Hard Boiled.
Although I'm happy to see live action adaptations of comics, most of my favorite comics are ones that I really don't want to see adapted to the screen. Some of them (Ronin, Night Force), it's because I don't trust anyone to do a good job, in part because I'm pretty sure doing a good job would necessarily mean creating a box-office flop. (I would dearly love for someone to prove me wrong, though.) Others, though, I just don't think belong on film - it's impossible for me to imagine enjoying a Dr. Strange film, or a Thor film, or a Cerebus film. (Did I just admit to really liking Dr. Strange, Thor and Cerebus? Oops.*) I've been wracking my brain since Spider-Man came out, trying to think of a property that I'm just dying to see on film; something that's actually plausible, if not likely. I think I've settled on Hard Boiled, now that I've been reminded. Sure, the plot isn't what's awesome about Hard Boiled; the movie would be totally different from the comic. But I think a successful Hollywood movie could be made that would still be recognizably Hard Boiled. And man, wouldn't that be awesome?
* - I also really dug ROM and Dial H for Hero, but I've outgrown those.
(no subject)
Mar. 29th, 2004 12:06 amAlright, here we go; Baxter v. Ford Motor Co., 12 P.2d 409 (Wash. 1932), appeal on remand at 35 P.2d 1090 (Wash 1934), ( a play in five acts: )
I really ought not to have spent an hour on this.
I really ought not to have spent an hour on this.
(no subject)
Feb. 26th, 2004 08:38 amSo. Having listened to "Poison" about 20 times since yesterday, I've discovered that I actually really like the lyrics. I didn't like them much when it first came out. It's possible that's because when it first came out, I didn't wanna hurt someone just to hear them screaming my name. I dunno. But even now, listening to the Alice Cooper version isn't the same for me - I'm not as involved, and I don't fancy the lyrics as much. This strikes me as odd, because the singer in the song is espousing the viewpoint that I identify with - why would I identify more when the singer is female? It's not like "The Leader of the Pack," which touches me because I pity the singer.
Upon further reflection, it seems to me that I simply don't believe males when they sing love songs. I've fervently expressed my undying love for a person when I wasn't just trying to get into their pants, and I'm sure other males have done so as well, but my fundamental assumption when I hear a guy go weak in the knees for a girl is that they're just horny. I believe Bruce Springsteen when he sings "I'm on Fire," but I have no faith whatsoever that Paul McCartney just wants to hold my hand. I'm having a hard time coming up with more examples of love songs sung by males, because I really don't like them. But as soon as a female sings them, suddenly my reaction is "Oh, yeah, I know just what she's talking about."
It's probably worth pointing out that when I say "love song" I mean songs sung to a target who we assume has some interest in the singer, or particularly mopey songs about how awesome the singer's loved one is. I have no problem with "it's too bad I'm too screwed up to have a chance with the girl I love" songs.
Upon further reflection, it seems to me that I simply don't believe males when they sing love songs. I've fervently expressed my undying love for a person when I wasn't just trying to get into their pants, and I'm sure other males have done so as well, but my fundamental assumption when I hear a guy go weak in the knees for a girl is that they're just horny. I believe Bruce Springsteen when he sings "I'm on Fire," but I have no faith whatsoever that Paul McCartney just wants to hold my hand. I'm having a hard time coming up with more examples of love songs sung by males, because I really don't like them. But as soon as a female sings them, suddenly my reaction is "Oh, yeah, I know just what she's talking about."
It's probably worth pointing out that when I say "love song" I mean songs sung to a target who we assume has some interest in the singer, or particularly mopey songs about how awesome the singer's loved one is. I have no problem with "it's too bad I'm too screwed up to have a chance with the girl I love" songs.
(no subject)
Feb. 15th, 2004 01:23 pmOrdinarily, I prefer having bad dreams to not being able to sleep. Last night, though, after an hour of lying awake (and I know that's not a lot for most people, but I'm the type that crashes within 5 minutes of laying down, normally) I ended up having one of those dreams that's just like real life, except things keep going wrong. Normally, I have those, and then I wake up and think through everything that's upsetting me at the moment and strike out all the ones that happened in the dream. This morning, though, I couldn't actually remember what happened in the dream. So all day, I'll have these things gnawing at me that aren't real, but that I can't displace because I can't actually remember what they are. Very frustrating.
In other news, there's a section heading in my contracts book with a title including the words "satisfaction," "mature," "perform," and "discharge." I try to keep the dirty mind in check while reading the casebooks, but that's a bit much to endure.
In other news, there's a section heading in my contracts book with a title including the words "satisfaction," "mature," "perform," and "discharge." I try to keep the dirty mind in check while reading the casebooks, but that's a bit much to endure.
(no subject)
Nov. 23rd, 2003 05:56 pmI know I have Festival built and running on some machine or other, but it doesn't look like it's any of the machines that are actually running, right now. Maybe it's on my computer at work? Oh well, not like I was getting anything done this evening, anyway. Am I the only person who cries when they find out that the only way to get functionality they need is to compile something?
UPDATE: I was right to cry. No luck on the laptop. I'm pretty sure the computer at work is the one that I got it working on - I think every time I've tried on Win?? at home, I've failed. I have a boot partition of FreeBSD with it somewhere, but that's a pain. I got it built on my webhost shell account, and then remembered why I didn't have it built there already - If I try to do more than two paragraphs, the process gets killed off.
UPDATE2: Well, fuck. I can't build it under Knoppix, either. Here, I thought I was being all clever. It looks like the answer is to build under gcc 2.95, or figure out why Festival won't build under 3.3.x.
UPDATE3: Ugh. Well, that just totally sucks. I couldn't get it to build under 3.2, either. I give. Guess I'll see what I have at work, tomorrow.
UPDATE: I was right to cry. No luck on the laptop. I'm pretty sure the computer at work is the one that I got it working on - I think every time I've tried on Win?? at home, I've failed. I have a boot partition of FreeBSD with it somewhere, but that's a pain. I got it built on my webhost shell account, and then remembered why I didn't have it built there already - If I try to do more than two paragraphs, the process gets killed off.
UPDATE2: Well, fuck. I can't build it under Knoppix, either. Here, I thought I was being all clever. It looks like the answer is to build under gcc 2.95, or figure out why Festival won't build under 3.3.x.
UPDATE3: Ugh. Well, that just totally sucks. I couldn't get it to build under 3.2, either. I give. Guess I'll see what I have at work, tomorrow.
(no subject)
Nov. 19th, 2003 02:06 amOk, I tried and I tried to refrain, but this latest entry is just too much.
Something I came across with Livejournal's random page feature? No. It's one of my fellow students. I can't deny that I succumb to the allure of the ellipsis myself, from time to time, but please - if I ever begin to use them like that (without..... irony, that.... is.), please just put me out of my misery.
Oh. For the sake of reference, whatever package is interposing itself between his fingers and the web substituted the unicode ellipsis character for his ellipses, and I switched it back. Other than that, it's cut and pasted; apply [sic] as necessary.
It’s....an experience I suppose most have had in some form. ( ... ) and..... for..... the briefest of moments shaking adrenaline you wander what its going to feel like the end crash gyrating mind spinning and its here they are trying to break you agghhhaggghhhgghahhhh its ahead the end the trap the corner the....finals.
Something I came across with Livejournal's random page feature? No. It's one of my fellow students. I can't deny that I succumb to the allure of the ellipsis myself, from time to time, but please - if I ever begin to use them like that (without..... irony, that.... is.), please just put me out of my misery.
Oh. For the sake of reference, whatever package is interposing itself between his fingers and the web substituted the unicode ellipsis character for his ellipses, and I switched it back. Other than that, it's cut and pasted; apply [sic] as necessary.
(no subject)
Nov. 19th, 2003 12:52 amHuh. I normally don't like to go to these sorts of things, but they might have found my weakness, this time.
(no subject)
Nov. 16th, 2003 10:13 pmBleah.
Once again, flail has been nominated as one of the worst comic strips on the web by the readers of PvP. I can't really figure out what it is about what I did that attracts such disdain. I guess I'll go ask.
UPDATE: Well. That's magnificent. It's 12 hours before my new account can post to the thread. I wonder if I'll even remember this tomorrow morning.
Once again, flail has been nominated as one of the worst comic strips on the web by the readers of PvP. I can't really figure out what it is about what I did that attracts such disdain. I guess I'll go ask.
UPDATE: Well. That's magnificent. It's 12 hours before my new account can post to the thread. I wonder if I'll even remember this tomorrow morning.
(no subject)
Oct. 18th, 2003 03:29 amSo I'm burnt out on citation exercises, and I decide to take a look at iTunes for Windows.
( And then I gripe about it for 2 pages or so. )
And just to add insult to... well, to bad UI... They have audiobooks marked "Explicit," but there's no way to search just for those books! Curses.
( And then I gripe about it for 2 pages or so. )
And just to add insult to... well, to bad UI... They have audiobooks marked "Explicit," but there's no way to search just for those books! Curses.
(no subject)
Aug. 24th, 2003 01:09 pmThings Which Were Clever When I Thought Of Them, But Which Are Stupid Now That I See Someone Thought Of Them Before I Did
(no subject)
Aug. 21st, 2003 01:51 pmUgh.
I was trying to look up the full context of "...sound and fury, signifying nothing..." (It's the second time I've had to do that, I don't know why I can never remember it.)
But I couldn't remember which play it was from. (I never really got Macbeth. There's a hole in my mind where a unified concept of what Macbeth is like should be. I've read it a couple of times, but it never sinks in.) So all I had to go on was the text I was trying to remember.
Go have a look at this. It's ridiculous. This isn't a "Google should have taken me directly to Macbeth Act 5 Scene 5" rant. Wasn't the phrase hackneyed after the first 20 times it was used as a title? If I lock it down in quotes, it only takes to page 3 before I find Macbeth, but... Argh. Don't people write their own metaphors any more? Rip off Shakespeare in the article body, and I won't gripe. But write your own damned titles, please.
Actually, I guess I shouldn't get upset. It's still less popular a title than this.
I was trying to look up the full context of "...sound and fury, signifying nothing..." (It's the second time I've had to do that, I don't know why I can never remember it.)
But I couldn't remember which play it was from. (I never really got Macbeth. There's a hole in my mind where a unified concept of what Macbeth is like should be. I've read it a couple of times, but it never sinks in.) So all I had to go on was the text I was trying to remember.
Go have a look at this. It's ridiculous. This isn't a "Google should have taken me directly to Macbeth Act 5 Scene 5" rant. Wasn't the phrase hackneyed after the first 20 times it was used as a title? If I lock it down in quotes, it only takes to page 3 before I find Macbeth, but... Argh. Don't people write their own metaphors any more? Rip off Shakespeare in the article body, and I won't gripe. But write your own damned titles, please.
Actually, I guess I shouldn't get upset. It's still less popular a title than this.