For those of you who have completely been out of touch with SF/fantasy fandom in the last few days, Joss Whedon's, it turns out, ex-wife Kai Cole has announced that they have been secretly divorced for several years, and accused him of repeatedly engaging in exploitative sexual relationships with actresses on his shows, and using his "feminist cred" both to get into such relationships and to deceive her about them.
I must admit, I'm upset but not shocked. I've distrusted Whedon in terms of his personal sex life for years. Firstly because of both his highly unprofessional and creepy remarks about women he's worked with on DVD commentaries (constantly "negging" Morena Baccarin, gushing over Summer Glau and two specific parts of her anatomy). Secondly because of the increasingly visible and embarrassing way that he writes at least one female character on each of his shows as an expression of personal fetishes which, while I don't judge anyone's private sexual fantasies, you would have thought that a pro-feminist man would be more self-critical about and less unembarrassed about putting on the screen (Drusilla, Fred, River, the entire concept of Dollhouse). I was far more shocked a few years ago at the allegations of ugly sexual misconduct on the part of the comics writer Brian Wood, whose work showed far less in the way of questionable sexualised content.
And I've become steadily more negative about the politics of Whedon's artistic work over the years, as you can probably see if you go through my "buffy", "angel", and "firefly" tags. It's not worth going into details here, but it boils down to a feeling, that a lot of people seem to share, that since the end of the Buffy TV show he's been capitalising on his self-created image as "Hollywood's most feminist man" while failing to keep up with further developments in political ideology, and producing work which at best has been nowhere near as good on gender as Buffy was, and at worst has been out-and-out sexist.
And the other reason, of course, has been my opinion that Russell T Davies's hero-worship of Whedon was behind an awful lot of the things I most dislike about his work on Doctor Who and spin-offs. Davies has even fallen into some of Whedon's off-screen tendencies, most notably when, at precisely the time that LJ fans started to seriously criticise his writing of Martha Jones on race and gender grounds, he did an interview for a newspaper in which he bluntly alleged that the only people who disliked his Doctor Who work were privileged right-wing bigots.
I must admit, I'm upset but not shocked. I've distrusted Whedon in terms of his personal sex life for years. Firstly because of both his highly unprofessional and creepy remarks about women he's worked with on DVD commentaries (constantly "negging" Morena Baccarin, gushing over Summer Glau and two specific parts of her anatomy). Secondly because of the increasingly visible and embarrassing way that he writes at least one female character on each of his shows as an expression of personal fetishes which, while I don't judge anyone's private sexual fantasies, you would have thought that a pro-feminist man would be more self-critical about and less unembarrassed about putting on the screen (Drusilla, Fred, River, the entire concept of Dollhouse). I was far more shocked a few years ago at the allegations of ugly sexual misconduct on the part of the comics writer Brian Wood, whose work showed far less in the way of questionable sexualised content.
And I've become steadily more negative about the politics of Whedon's artistic work over the years, as you can probably see if you go through my "buffy", "angel", and "firefly" tags. It's not worth going into details here, but it boils down to a feeling, that a lot of people seem to share, that since the end of the Buffy TV show he's been capitalising on his self-created image as "Hollywood's most feminist man" while failing to keep up with further developments in political ideology, and producing work which at best has been nowhere near as good on gender as Buffy was, and at worst has been out-and-out sexist.
And the other reason, of course, has been my opinion that Russell T Davies's hero-worship of Whedon was behind an awful lot of the things I most dislike about his work on Doctor Who and spin-offs. Davies has even fallen into some of Whedon's off-screen tendencies, most notably when, at precisely the time that LJ fans started to seriously criticise his writing of Martha Jones on race and gender grounds, he did an interview for a newspaper in which he bluntly alleged that the only people who disliked his Doctor Who work were privileged right-wing bigots.
Dr. Jones
Date: 2017-08-23 11:40 pm (UTC)But I wanted to talk to you about Martha. I LOVED Martha. A genuine physician, a young black woman with a complicated family life, and Freema had her own particular dynamic with Tennant--different, but just as effective as Piper and Tate.
That said ...
After all that beautiful setup in "Smith and Jones", Davies never fully developed the character. She turned into the Rebound Companion, mooning over the Doctor while he still held a torch for Rose. The only thing keeping "Family of Blood/Human Nature" from perfection was Martha grumbling that "John" didn't fall in love with her. The character deserved so much better.
So when Martha rallied humanity in "Last of the Time Lords" and gave the "this is me, getting out" speech, I nearly stood up and cheered. In a sense, she was giving it to Davies. (Not even the relative lameness of her S4 appearances could diminish that speech.)
I never felt that Davies' characterization of Martha was racist or sexist. Lazy as hell?
No argument there ...
Re: Dr. Jones
Date: 2017-08-24 08:56 am (UTC)Well, initially the major critique over Martha centred on "Human Nature"/"The Family of Blood", simply because of how explosive and charged the image of the African-American maid figure is in US culture. (It really doesn't have the same existence in Britain, because of the much smaller proportion of black people in Britain during the heyday of domestic service.) But even given the transatlantic cultural divisions people were still unhappy about the Doctor and/or the TARDIS putting Martha in that situation when they had the whole of space and time to lie low in. (In the 1990s novel Human Nature, the companion was a white woman who was acting as "Dr. Smith"'s poor cousin rather than his servant.)
And when Martha's arc fully ended, a lot of people including me were angry that RTD had made the show's first black primary companion (on TV) the first one to be intentionally conceived and written as "the one the Doctor didn't like as much as the previous one". I felt that Martha's ending scene was a bit too far towards "apologising to Ten for the fact that he didn't fancy her". (I liked the first half of the scene, really hated her coming back in and what she said then.) Especially because the new generation of Who fandom at the time was dominated by hardcore Ten/Rose shippers who were convinced, encouraged by some of RTD's glorification of Rose in comparison to old-school companions in interviews, that RTD's Who was essentially a paranormal romance story, that Martha was the essentially unsympathetic "rebound", and that the RTD show was going to end, probably as the final end of the franchise, with a Ten/Rose "endgame" happy ending. I remember defriending someone on LJ because they'd gone hardcore into Ten/Rose and wrote a whole essay about how Martha's arc was all about recognising that she wasn't as good as Rose and didn't deserve the Doctor because she was a "Sam" while Rose was a "Frodo".
And also there was the fact that RTD seemed to have a recurring tic of writing a non-white character in love with a white character who didn't return their affections at all or only saw it as a casual thing - as well as Ten and Martha there were Rose and Mickey and Owen and Tosh, and some fans also thought that there was a friendship rather than romance version between Sarah and Clyde in the first season of Sarah Jane Adventures (which was corrected later, it was mostly because all the stories in that season seemed to have a sex-segregated plot approach with Sarah and Maria on one track and Clyde and Luke on the other).
Re: Dr. Jones
Date: 2017-08-24 09:07 am (UTC)As reinforced by pairing Mickey off with Martha in Journey's End rather than her canonical white love interest, the one who got killed saving her in the year that never was, and whom she found again. That really was a "You what?" moment among a mass of them.
Martha Gets (While the Getting's Good)
Date: 2017-08-24 07:20 pm (UTC)I never saw Martha's big speech as an apology for her supposed inferiority to Rose. She'd spent the majority of that episode fomenting a worldwide psychic rebellion right under the Master's nose. She executed the plan flawlessly. She saved her loved ones and she rescued the Doctor from a lifetime of Dobby-ness. She was coming in from a position of strength.
"This is me, getting out" was Martha telling Ten that she's strong enough to leave the most exciting, thrilling adventure of her life because it would wreck her emotionally if she stayed. She left on her own terms, instead of the Doctor dumping her by the side of the road.
Look at Tennant's reaction--the Doctor knows she's right. She got him through his post-Tyler blues and he'd love it if she stayed, but he absolutely respects her decision and is PROUD of her decision. She has a calling as a doctor and a family who needs her, and she'll carry on with the Mission in her own way. She doesn't need to apologize to anyone.
As for her humiliating stint as a chambermaid in Cornell's two-parter, it stings because it's supposed to sting. Maybe we're not supposed to look back at 1912 with a warm, amber-tinged nostalgia. Maybe we should take a hard look at an era where the idea of a woman doctor is mocked like a child's idle notion, and where a generation of young men is lined up as cannon fodder. The episode is better, not worse, for meeting the racism of the era head on.
Re: Martha Gets (While the Getting's Good)
Date: 2017-08-25 11:06 am (UTC)The point is that the Doctor and/or the TARDIS *chose* to go there and put her in that situation, which puts an unnecessary bad light on them.
Re: Martha Gets (While the Getting's Good)
Date: 2017-08-25 12:42 pm (UTC)Re: Dr. Jones
Date: 2017-08-25 11:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-08-24 12:55 am (UTC)A few months ago, when people were tweeting about Whedon's Wonder Woman script, I read this post by LaurelJupiter on Tumblr which articulated a lot of my discomfort with Whedon's post BTVS/Angel work. Excerpt:
no subject
Date: 2017-08-24 08:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-08-24 08:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-08-26 12:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-08-31 07:43 pm (UTC)And then it struck me: they all start off meek, shy, timid, even a bit wimpy, and then something happens and makes them powerful:
- Drusilla: goes from injured to restored to full power in Buffy S2. (And then in flashbacks, goes from devout catholic to vampire.)
- Fred: goes from normal Fred to Illyria.
- River: goes from normal to super-powered, prior to the events on-screen.
- Dollhouse: as the OP says, whole concept...
And usually there's a man who's rejected by her in her powerful form, who in some of the cases was her partner in her meek form:
- Spike both times with Dru, poor thing: disregarded for Angel in S2, and the hapless poet in the flashbacks
- Wesley with Fred
- the doctor guy with River, I suppose.
- I don't remember enough about Dollhouse...
Do we definitely know that it's Joss's fantasy to be hated by strong women, or is it speculation that he's projecting himself into the Spike/Wesley/etc character at that point?
no subject
Date: 2017-08-31 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-09-02 06:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-09-07 08:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-09-02 06:49 am (UTC)So... after all this came out, I did see some confirmation shared on facebook by someone who dated Whedon after he moved out of his home with Kai Cole but before the divorce was finalized and public. Both the person who posted and the person who dated Whedon are okay with this being shared, but please read carefully and be respectful before deciding to leave any comments on the post. (The original post was edited to include the statement from the person who dated Whedon, and the first few comments are in response to the original version.)
no subject
Date: 2017-09-04 09:26 pm (UTC)I've heard poly people say that polyamory isn't cheating, but I've sometimes felt that they perhaps aren't aware of the reverse, which is that cheating isn't polyamory. If you like cheating, then in some cases it's actually some elements of actual cheating you like: the taboo, the risk, and so on.
no subject
Date: 2017-08-24 01:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-08-24 02:05 am (UTC)In his cultural heyday, Whedon was very effortful at promoting himself in ways that rang to me as a pose.
no subject
Date: 2017-08-24 08:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-08-24 09:39 am (UTC)I'm not really surprized and to be honest it doesn't change much for me. I can like parts of his work and dislike him. I hope the whole male feminist hero whorship gets tuned down, though. There are writers with way more interesting ideas in that area these days.
no subject
Date: 2017-08-24 09:51 am (UTC)Crikey. That's a pretty egregious misreading of Lord of the Rings, too.
no subject
Date: 2017-08-26 05:19 am (UTC)(For one thing, on one level wouldn't comparing them the other way around be more apt? Not that they have the relationship that Sam and Frodo do.)
no subject
Date: 2017-08-24 09:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-08-24 10:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-08-24 10:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-08-24 10:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-08-24 11:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-08-25 10:57 pm (UTC)Gross, gross, gross, and not very full of self-insight either.
no subject
Date: 2017-08-24 12:31 pm (UTC)Eugh, seriously? I never listened to any of his commentaries so I had no idea.
it boils down to a feeling, that a lot of people seem to share, that since the end of the Buffy TV show he's been capitalising on his self-created image as "Hollywood's most feminist man" while failing to keep up with further developments in political ideology
Yeah, this has been one of my main criticisms of his work after Buffy as well. One of the least suprising elements in Kai Cole's blog was the whole "I'm a feminist, so I can't be bad" aspect. Many of the creators whose work I've followed have said or done problematic things, but none of them have seemed so unwilling to learn and change as Whedon.
no subject
Date: 2017-08-25 11:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-08-25 11:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-08-25 11:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-08-25 11:01 pm (UTC)http://josswhedonisnotafeminist.tumblr.com/post/114093159176/charisma-was-not-fired-for-being-pregnant-true