Avatar

Izzy

@izzytheweirdcreature

She/her
Just your friendly weird emo girl. Basically don’t pay attention to me I just exist

Spot my bird challenge. If you find her, you get 1 mk point

thought of this as soon as I saw where she was lmao the stupids :P

AWWWWWWWW THIS IS SO SO CUTE!!!! Winnie might be initially scared of raph but once she gets used to him she’ll never leave his side. She’s a Velcro bird after all :)

Avatar
motherfrigginpsas

LISTEN UP AGAIN KIDS STOP REBLOGGING THIS FUCKING GARBAGE POST. IT IS 100% FUCKING BULLSHIT AND CAN AND MOST DEFINITELY WILL LITERALLY KILL. DO YOU NOT SEE WARNING LABELS THAT SAY “DO NOT INDUCE VOMITING”? THEY AREN’T FUCKING AROUND. YOU CAN FUCKING BURN THEIR ESOPHAGUS BY CAUSING VOMITING, CAUSE CHOKING, DROWNING, OR MAKE IT WORSE! AGAIN DO NOT FORCE ANYTHING DOWN ANYONE’S THROAT. THEY. CAN. DROWN. IF SOMEONE IS LOSING CONCIOUSNESS ALL THE CHIT CHAT IN THE WORLD WILL NOT PREVENT IT AT THAT POINT THEY ARE IN SERIOUS DANGER. “Buuut i don’t wanna take them to the hospital!!!” WELL SUNSHINE GLAD YOU’D RATHER HAVE A DEAD FRIEND THAN A LIVING ONE BUT YOU’RE IN LUCK CALL FUCKING POISON CONTROL. THEY ARE NOT THE COPS. THEY WILL HELP YOU. AND IF THEY SAY GO TO THE FUCKING HOSPITAL YOU GO TO THE FUCKING HOSPITAL. NO EXCUSES. 0. NONE. I have seen this shit cross my dash SO MANY TIMES so PLEASE fucking reblog this and prevent some well meaning idiot from accidentally killing someone they love!

Avatar
feytaline-loves-deactivated2018

For the love of god PLEASE REBLOG THIS

I see this stupid fucking post one a goddamn week and someone is going to literally fucking die from it

Avatar
oneshoeshort-deactivated2021060

IF YOU WONT LISTEN TO OP, LISTEN TO THE RETIRED PARAMEDIC WHO HAS SEEN PEOPLE DIE FROM THIS SHIT.

Poison control may advise diluting the toxin somehow like with water or milk, otherwise do not give them something to drink and take the empty pill bottle/ blister pack with you to the hospital.

btw just searched it up, US poison control number is 1 800 222 1222

Avatar
isearchedtheyooniverse-deactiva

F U C K I N G

R E B L O G

T H I S

W H E N E V E R

Y O U   S E E   T H I S

O N   Y O U R   D A S H

UM

R E B L O G

I DONT CARE WHO YOU ARE

R E B L O G

i felt like this was important idk

PLEASE REBLOG!

In Canada, 1-844-764-7669 will connect you with a national poison control center

Take me to the emergency room and call poison control. 😓

Avatar
ne0n-ys-deactivated20260711

found a weird kid bingo on Pinterest and decided to do it :)

yippieeeee :)

here is the template if anyone wants to do it

Thx for the tag!!

Eyyy I got a bingo

Open tags <33

Thanks for the tag ^^

I crossed out all except, like, 4-

Pffff, idk what some of the tiles mean but i crossed out a few. I feel like there should be an ao3 tile.

Thanks for the template, anyway nu bingo sadly 🥲

The Surfacing of the Epstein Files

Is The Iran War A Way To Divert Attention From Epstein?

The resurfacing of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein is not simply a lurid footnote in America’s tabloid history. It is a stress test for our institutions — our courts, our political system, our media, and our collective moral courage. The question is no longer whether Epstein committed monstrous crimes. That has been established. The question is whether the powerful networks that enabled him will ever face meaningful scrutiny.

Epstein’s crimes were not hidden in some dark, unreachable corner of society. They unfolded in plain sight, in elite circles that intersected with politics, finance, academia, and royalty. For years, rumors circulated, settlements were sealed, investigations stalled, and consequences evaporated. When Epstein died in federal custody in 2019, the public was left with a combination of outrage and suspicion — not only about the failures that led to his death, but about whether the full story would ever come to light.

The resurfacing of court documents, flight logs, depositions, and investigative materials has revived that unresolved tension. Transparency advocates argue that sunlight is essential: victims deserve acknowledgment, and the public deserves clarity about who knew what — and when. But transparency must be careful, precise, and responsible. A name appearing in a document is not the same as evidence of criminal conduct. The rush to speculate, particularly in a social media ecosystem built on outrage, risks undermining the very accountability people claim to demand.

Still, the broader issue is undeniable: Epstein thrived because systems failed.

He secured a controversial federal plea deal in 2008 that allowed him to serve minimal jail time despite serious charges involving minors. That deal, later widely criticized, signaled something corrosive — that wealth and influence could bend the arc of justice. Prosecutorial discretion, normally a routine function of the justice system, became a symbol of two-tiered accountability.

When institutions appear to shield the powerful, public trust erodes. And once trust erodes, conspiracy fills the vacuum.

The Epstein case has become a magnet for both legitimate investigative journalism and unfounded speculation. That duality reflects a deeper crisis in American civic life. On one hand, citizens rightly demand transparency when elites are implicated in wrongdoing. On the other hand, political actors have weaponized the case to score partisan points, often implying guilt without evidence or using it to feed broader narratives about corruption without substantiation.

The danger is not just misinformation. It is selective outrage.

Accountability must be consistent to be credible. If the surfacing of files reveals institutional failures, prosecutorial errors, or deliberate obstruction, those findings should be pursued wherever they lead — regardless of party, profession, or social status. Justice cannot be calibrated by political convenience. Nor should it become a tool for factional warfare.

Pam Bondi, the Attorney General, has faced mounting pressure over the Justice Department’s handling of records connected to Jeffrey Epstein. Critics argue that Bondi’s resistance to releasing certain investigative files — citing ongoing prosecutions, privacy protections for victims, and national security concerns — has led to deepening public distrust in institutions already strained by years of secrecy and conspiracy. In a political climate where transparency has become synonymous with accountability, Bondi’s posture has fueled suspicions that powerful names or embarrassing institutional failures remain shielded from scrutiny, turning what could be a methodical legal process into a broader test of the Justice Department’s credibility.

At the same time, we must recognize the human core of this story: the victims. Too often, public discourse centers on the famous names rumored to be associated with Epstein rather than on the young women who were exploited. The legal battles over document release and redaction are not abstract transparency debates; they are bound up with privacy concerns, trauma, and the right of survivors to control their own narratives.

True accountability means caring about those victims, not using them as collateral in a political spectacle.

The surfacing of the Epstein files also exposes how power operates in America. Influence is not always about explicit criminal conspiracies. It is often about access, social insulation, and the quiet reluctance of institutions to challenge those at the top. When prosecutors hesitate, when regulators defer, when universities accept donations without scrutiny, and when media outlets soft-pedal uncomfortable stories, a culture of impunity takes root.

If there is any constructive path forward, it lies in structural reform rather than personality-driven outrage. That means stricter oversight of prosecutorial plea agreements in high-profile cases. It means stronger protection for whistleblowers. It means clearer transparency standards for sealed federal records

The public’s appetite for answers is understandable. But the demand must be disciplined. Investigations should be evidence-based. Media coverage should distinguish clearly between documented facts and allegations. Political leaders should resist the temptation to exploit uncertainty for partisan advantage.

The joint military operation with Israel has moved Epstein off the front pages. But I do not believe the American people will lose their quest for answers. The elites worry about reputation, but the people identify more so with the victims of this horrendous episode in American life.

The surfacing of the Epstein files is not just about revisiting the sins of one disgraced financier. It is about whether American institutions can withstand scrutiny and emerge stronger.

Epstein’s crimes revealed moral rot in elite spaces. What happens next will reveal whether our democracy still possesses the will to confront that rot honestly.

T Michael Smith

wwwtmichaelsmith.com

Technoblade

Technoblade 

Avatar
jade-jupiter-deactivated2022091

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Avatar
minecraftaccount

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Technoblade

Nomad of Nowhere is Rooster Teeth's underrated gem of a show that deserved more attention but suffered from poor management and terrible marketing.

Reblogs Are Appreciated!

PSA

EVERYONE BE CAREFUL. ARCHIVE OF OUR OWN PHISHING SITE (first link)

(the link is purple bc i clicked on it to get the link w/o special characters to report to various phising page report places).

the page leads to what appears to be the normal archive page, w/ the popup about the privacy policy & everything, with the url https://xn--iao3-lw4b.ws/media DO NOT LOG IN. THEY ARE HERE TO STEAL YOUR LOGIN CREDENTIALS. LOOK AT URLS BEFORE ENTERING ANY PERSONAL INFO.

STAY SAFE ON THE INTERNET GUYS!!

please reblog to spread this warning!!