The Write Life

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
wizardarchetypes
tlirsgender

I love when I check my bank account and it just deadnames me and calls me broke

tlirsgender

Anyway hello [tumblr] I legiterally have 62 dollars right now if anyone would like to help an unemployed disabled transgender ndn bitch out lmao?

$TLirs or vnmo tlirsgender or check out my itch.io

tlirsgender

Hi thank you tumblr I have more than 62 dollars now 💃 really appreciate it I'm just still circulating this post due to the (gestures broadly) unemployed disabled transgender ndn situation lol

wizardarchetypes

help my beloved mutual if you can ✨

hetchdrive
yeyinde

Collins is gone.

image
image

Namaygoosisagagun First Nation/Collins has burned to the ground. The entire community is nothing but ashes after being quickly consumed by wildfires. They did not have any support from emergency services, and no one offered aid. The community saved themselves by escaping into boats because no one came.

Mishkeegogamang and Cat Lake have lost power. Families are ending up in shelters with nothing. Armstrong, Lac La Croix, Whitesand, Gull Bay, Lac des Mille Lacs are currently in the fires path and all members are being evacuated.

All this loss, all this devastation, and it was entirely preventable.

After steadily underfunding wildland firefighting and purposefully excluding Indigenous wildland firefighters and Indigenous wildfire organizations from wildfire operations, firefighter training, decisionmaking, and resource exchanges, in 2025, Doug Ford slashed the forest firefighting budget.

It's hard to ignore his decision to cut funding and leave us out of adequate fire training (even though we've lived with forest fires for thousands of years—far longer than settlers have been in Canada—and made sure fires like the ones we're all seeing today were prevented through kinisitotēn) when, despite making up less than 5% of the population, we account for 42% percent of all wildfire evacuations in Canada.

And when we are successfully evacuated, we face discrimination and racism—like Kashechewan—because it's always been easier to blame us than it is to blame the true culprit: denialism, corportate greed, and colonization.

The people of Collins and every other impacted community deserve better.

Right now, the AFN is currently accepting donations to help Collins First Nation. If you're able to, please consider donating.

ONWA (Ontario Native Women's Association) is another great place to donate to. They have outreach vans going to motels and inns and offering food, water, resources, and cultural support to those impacted by the wildfires.

Other places to consider donating to are Mikinakoos Emergency Fund, Red Cross, True North Aid, Indigenous Climate Action. You can also send donations directly to Whitesand First Nation via e-transfer (donations@whitesandfirstnation.com) and they request that you add your full name in the e-transfer comment section to receive a tax receipt.

*Before sending money, verify that the appeal appears on an official First Nation, Tribal Council or registered charity channel.

If you can't offer financial support, please consider donating items of need. Moontime Connections is currently accepting drop-off donations. If you live in the Thunder Bay area, Namaygoosisagagun Health Office is also taking in donations! They can also bemailed to Superior Inn Hotel & Conference Centre at 555 West Arthur Street, Thunder Bay, ON, P7E 5P8.

items needed are: food, diapers, medical masks, men’s and women’s joggers (all sizes), children’s clothing (newborn to size 14), children’s shoes, summer clothing, men’s clothing, toiletries (lotion, Vaseline, toothpaste, toothbrushes, shampoo, conditioner, soap, deodorant, etc.), strollers, adult depends-all sizes, dog & cat food

wīya ispīh iyiniw-kiskīyihtamowin pasikōpayiki kāwi askiy ta-iyihyīmakan

hetchdrive
liquidlyrium

Just saw this on Bsky:

Please blow up the public comment (included below): BREAKING NEWS (7/15) — The administration wants to destroy Chaco Canyon without consulting Tribal Nations. It’s an irreplaceable historic & cultural site with 4,700 archeological sites that could be lost to the bulldozers of oil & gas development

Image from Chaco Canyon showing an archaeological siteALT
Screenshot from the BLM/NEPA website that states the comment period ends July 29 at midnight, Mountain Daylight Time (UTC - 6)ALT

— Kelly Lynne D’Angelo ✨ (@kellylynnedang.bsky.social) July 15, 2026 at 7:29 PM

Here is the link to comment! Say something unique about what matters to you! The historicity of the site, the ecological impacts of mining, the preservation and protection of National Parks and public resources, tourism and travel, Indigenous rights! But say *something*

batmanisagatewaydrug
psychic-waffles

We're at the "JK Rowling is personally funding litigation to try and destroy AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL" stage of rabid UK terf brain.

Screenshot via Alejandra Caraballo @esqueer.net on bluesky

Quoted tweet from Trans Widows' Voices. @transwidows: Whilst I understand the detriment to Beira's Place is real, and focussing on @jk rowling get clicks it's a shame that mainstream press coverage of the Amnesty debacle is not also focussing on us smaller groups listed who do …  Tweet thread from J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling:  Should any of the women's organisations targeted by @AmnestyUK's recent 'anti-rights' blacklist wish to take legal action, applications can be made to the JK Rowling Women's Fund. jkrwf.org  Gay men's organisations named on the list are welcome to contact me through my website. While the JK Rowling's Fund was set up to support women, JK Rowling herself is more than happy to donate to your legal fighting fund.ALT

Tldr Amnesty International, global human rights organisation, published a report called 'A growing threat: the anti-rights movement in the UK'. In it is detailed, amongst others, a whole bunch of transphobic groups and organisations, including Beira's Place, JK Rowling's trans exclusionary sexual violence support service. JK Rowling threw a shit fit and got Amnesty to take the report down by threatening libel. This was obviously not enough, because you can't appease a fascist, so now she's going to bankroll a bunch of lawsuits anyway through the JK Rowling Women's Fund.*

You can read an archived version of the report here, please save it and share it.

*Not so friendly reminder there is no way to engage in the wizard books without enabling this shit.

disasterhimbo
littlestpersimmon

image

Please help me go into remission from Type II diabetes

Hello everyone, I am so sorry to remake this post, but I am very scared. I am experiencing embarassing and vulnerable symptoms- my type II diabetes is becoming progressive, and I am desperate to go into remission. It has affected my liver and my heart, and neuropathy has made me partially incontinent. On April I was hospitalized twice. I have no thyroid, and without medication, it will put me into a myxedema coma and will kill me within days. Hypothyroidism and type II diabetes is making it very difficult for me to find work, as I am from the global south (the Philippines), with government aid only covering 20,000 pesos (around 326 usd) a year. I am the only person in my family who can work; my mother is paralyzed from a brain injury, and my sister is autistic with a very low frustration threshold. I need help covering for my new medication, as I now take metformin twice a day, and phosphates to help with my liver and kidneys, and b complex to help bolster my immune system. Im sorry I keep remaking this post, I am alone and desperate. Community is all I have. Thank you so much for your endless grace and compassion.

Please come buy my prints!

https://www.inprnt.com/gallery/littlestpersimmon/

I have 400 exclusive artwork on patreon for only a dollar a month!

https://www.patreon.com/littlestpersimmon


You can also submit a tip here if yohd like, I promise I will do everything I can to give back to the community when I am in a better position to

littlestpersimmon

Hey everyone, I am sorry for incessantly reblogging this. For pride I am asking for mutual aid. I got laid off at work. As contract says, I will not be getting paid outside of a kiIl fee, which I have no word on when I will receive. I am really struggling with the rising cost of everything, as I am the only caretaker of a family of four and our four cats. My mother is also severely disabled with liver failure. Im at my wits end just trying to keep afloat. Thank you so much

wizardarchetypes
gallusrostromegalus

I Have No Teeth And I Must Fundraise


Hey everyone,

It's Your Local Bardic entity, Gallus Rostromengalus of Bread Jesus and other Weird Tumblr Story Fame.

Despite my best efforts to mitigate mt Terrible English Dental DNA, today two of my teeth broke.

I don't even have a fun story about this, it's literally terrible genetics and stress-grinding my teeth in my sleep.

I just got back from emergency surgery to get the pieces pulled and the hole in my jaw closed so I don't get an infection, but a second reconstruction surgery to give me a bone graft and dental implants will be needed so I can actually chew and use my mouth for it's intended purposes.

I do not currently have dental insurance.
I haven't talked about it here much, but my husband was unemployed after getting laid off for almost all of last year. He has a job again, but it pays like 2/3rds of his previous one and the benefits are crap. Like no dental insurance until he's worked there at least a year.

So I'm on the hook for the full cost of Today's emergency surgery, Medication, and the necessary follow-up reconstruction, which my dentist estimates will cost between $5000-$7000. Our dentist has given us every discount she can and we have a payment plan, but losing half our household income has left us with no savings and credit cards at their limits.

Even though I only need to come up with $500 this month to go ahead with the reconstructive surgery, I do not have any money to spare. It will also be VASTLY cheaper overall to pay for everything up front rather than pay interest over the months with the payment plan, but literally anything will help me right now.

Link To My GoFundMe

Link To My Ko-Fi

Thank you all so much,
Gallus

image

Pic of Chaleston Chew lounging on his pillows because pics generally help these posts but I do not want to inflict images of Dental Trauma on all of you.

hetchdrive
bovid-beauty

Last week, the Trump administration quietly released a sweeping new federal rule that would use funding threats to force institutions across the country to reject transgender people. The 400-page proposed regulation would codify the administration's anti-trans executive orders into binding federal policy, imposing a blanket prohibition on federal funds going toward "gender ideology"

The proposed rule, formally titled "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance," rewrites the government-wide framework governing all federal grants across every agency. Among its most consequential provisions, it requires that before a federal grant recipient can receive money, the award must pass a "pre-issuance review" conducted by a political appointee—not a career expert or peer reviewer—to ensure it is "consistent with applicable law, Federal agency priorities, and the national interest." The regulation explicitly instructs these appointees to screen for "denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans or the notion that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic." [...] An institution that acknowledges transgender people exist—through its policies, its training, its healthcare, its bathroom access, its HR procedures, its name-change processes—could be deemed to "deny the sex binary" or to “support the notion that sex is mutable” and have its federal funding blocked.

Importantly, the gender ideology prohibition has no age limitation—hospitals could be targeted not just for providing care to minors but for providing gender-affirming care to adults, because prescribing hormone therapy to a transgender patient of any age could be deemed promoting the belief that "sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic."

junequeer

THIS IS OPEN TO COMMENT UNTIL JULY 13, 2026

featherandstorm

This is all very bad and horrible, but I want to be clear that it’s worse and more sweeping than just eliminating trans research.

This torches everything. And I do mean everything.

A very abbreviated list of its ramifications include (but are not limited to):

  • ending funding for ALL DEI related initiatives
  • allowing the government to terminate grants at any point for any reason
  • preventing researchers from publishing, going to conferences, and being part of academic societies
  • requiring that topics must support the president’s agenda.

What this means, and if anything I’m under selling it, is the death of science and research in America. It allows the government to restrict any topic they please at a whims notice, putting officials who have no background in the topic in charge of deciding funding continuity. It controls what gets researched and if/how researchers are allowed to share their discoveries. There are no books to burn if the government never allows them to be written. This is fascism plain and simple.

Please, if you only ever write one public comment, this is the one to do.

genderkoolaid

Bringing back this guide to writing an effective public comment. This gives you the basics you need to know, what you need to include, a basic outline you can follow, etc.

What Makes an Effective Public Comment on a Federal Regulation  Federal agencies make many of their big policy decisions through what is called a “rulemaking process.ˮ An important part of this process is gathering and considering feedback from the general public—thatʼs you!—on whether a proposed rule is a good idea. Federal law requires agencies to allow time for these comments, and to consider and address them when making final decisions.   Submitting a comment is an important way to influence government action that may affect your life. There is no specific format required, but this explainer provides some guidance on how to write an effective comment.  The Basics: Who, What, When  Who can comment on a proposed rule? Any member of the public (private individuals, organizations and associations on behalf of their members, etc.) can submit a public comment. Comments can be submitted anonymously.  What is a comment? Is it a way of voting on a rule? These comments do not function as votes for or against a rule. Rather, they matter because, at their best, they provide the government with relevant, detailed, and reliable opinions informed by the professional and personal experiences of the commentators.  Whatʼs the purpose of a comment? Comments can build a record of opinion, inform the government about unforeseen impacts of the regulation, and refute or affirm assumptions relied upon by an agency to draft its proposed rule. And comments raise the bar that agencies have to meet when making a rule; “if an agency fails to adequately respond to significant, relevant comments in a final rule, members of the public may seek to challenge the rule in court on that basis and claim it could be struck down.ˮ  Is there a deadline for commenting? Yes. The proposed rule is ordinarily posted online, and the agency specifies a deadline—typically, there is a 30 to 60 day window for comments.ALT
What does a comment typically look like?  There is no required structure or word limit when writing a comment. If you are looking for guidance, consider including the following components:  Introduction: Explains why you are interested in the regulation and highlights the personal or professional experience(s) that inform your opinion  Background: Identifies the part(s) of the regulation you are commenting on, and clearly states your opposition or support for each.  Arguments and Analysis: Explains how the proposed rule might impact you personally and/or professionally, whether the agency relied on incorrect information, unintended consequences of the proposed rule that were not considered, etc.  Recommendation(s): Offers suggestions on specific changes you would make to the proposed rule. Those changes could be to not proceed with the entire rule or certain parts of it or to change specific sections.  Conclusion: Summarizes your main argument and re-lists your recommendations. Remind the agency whether you support or oppose their proposed rule.  How to write an effective public comment  Review the regulation: Understand the regulation before commenting on it. Most regulations have an introduction and background section where the agency lays out the purpose of the regulation and any applicable laws. The agency will then include its justifications for the proposed rule. The last section of the regulation typically is the text of the actual proposed rule. You can search for and read proposed federal regulations on Regulations.gov. You can filter your search by looking up a specific agency, the Regulatory Information Number (“RINˮ), and/or navigating to the search bar at Regulations.gov and typing in key words that relate to the proposed rule.  Take a stance: Clearly state whether you agree with or disagree with the proposed rule (or an aspect of it). If a rule raises many issues, you do not have to comment on every one–you can select the issues that you understand the best and that concern you the most.ALT
Get specific: After you state whether you support or oppose the proposed rule or a part of it, your comment should specifically explain the rationale behind your opinion. Emphasize how this rule would have a positive or negative impact on your specific situation (or overall, based on your professional or personal experiences). Specific and substantive comments are more likely to require responses from an agency.  Name your experience or expertise: Identify the credentials and experiences that distinguish you from other commenters. It is OK if you are not a scientific or regulatory law expert! All perspectives are needed.  Speak from your perspective: Are you part of a relevant industry that would be affected by this proposed rule? (e.g. science, agriculture, business, etc.). If the answer is yes, draw from that experience.  Rely on your experience: Are you a person who has “on the ground experienceˮ with the subject matter or impact of the rule—that is, someone who would be directly affected by the agencyʼs decision? If the answer is yes, draw from that experience  Back up your opinions: Where possible you can and should refer to multiple sources (personal insights and/or quantitative data-driven facts) to support your comment.  Cite the proposed rule: All comments must include the agency name and docket or RIN. If you are commenting on a particular subpart or section of the proposed rule, reference the heading and page number of that subpart or section from the Federal Register document. If you are commenting on a particular word, phrase, or sentence in the proposed rule, provide the page number and paragraph citation from the Federal Register document.  Offer alternative options: If you disagree with the rule (or a section of it), it can help to suggest an alternative and explain how the alternative is more effective or better meets the same policy objective. The alternative could be to do away with the entire regulation (or part of it).  Address the “other sideˮ: If you are able, it may be helpful to address trade-offs or counter opposing views in your comment.ALT

Public comments are not a vote, it is a chance for you to say "here is an issue with this law I think you need to address" and provide justification for legal challenges if it goes forward:

"Comments raise the bar that agencies have to meet when making a rule; “if an agency fails to adequately respond to significant, relevant comments in a final rule, members of the public may seek to challenge the rule in court on that basis and claim it could be struck down.ˮ"

But also, if possible, don't stop at writing a comment. Don't stop at calling your representatives. You should ideally be talking to people in your community about this and organizing resistance on-the-ground; there is a good chance people are already doing that even if you aren't hearing about it.

cherrispryte

Some added 101-level context from someone (me) who’s worked in federal grantmaking for 20 years and is literally certified on this document - this is a document that governs all federal grantmaking. It’s been around for over a decade and is a mega-document that combine multiple previous smaller documents that have been around for ages. It is updated every few years and generally the updates are minor - a notable change in the previous update was raising the small procurement threshold from $10,000 to $15,000 for example. Deeply dry boring minutiae that no one outside of federal grantmakers need concern themselves with. It was also federal GUIDELINES, which means there was flexibility.

This year’s is different. They are now federal REQUIREMENTS, which means there’s no flexibility. As was said previously, the 400 pages are not singularly devoted to being absolute shitheads to trans people. Theres a lot of stuff in there, some of which is the standard dry boring grants stuff, some of which is the horrible ideological warfare outlined above.

This document is issued by the OMB, the Office of Management and Budget, which is currently lead by fucking Russell Vought, the principal architect of Project 2025. This is how they’re going to implement all the horrible shit in there that wasn’t covered by Executive Order. Russell Vought is actively coming for my job, my marriage, and my kid, and most of my friends lost their jobs last year because of him. He is the fucking arch villain behind the heinous shit the current regime is doing.

So yes, please comment. You don’t have to read all 400 pages before doing so, it’s dry and dense as fuck, but I thought this information might be helpful. Also, while there is a public comment period, this isn’t voted on by Congress. The OMB just fucking issues it. Pressuring your elected officials into publicly saying “hey what the fuck are you doing here” is good, though.

mikkeneko

Please note the comment period is open through JULY 13th, not JUNE 13th. I saw a lot of relogs yesterday saying "last day!" and I just want to say it is very much not too late.

grison-in-space

As of today, 7/8/26, we have five days for public commentary on this to go through. I am begging y'all: if you care about independent science in the country that produces the most global science funding in the world, please leave a comment.