🖌️ Minor publishing code syntax
#1099
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I like adding some space to seperate out the caller base object with the local variable for ease of visual parsing
ElliotFriend
approved these changes
Nov 6, 2025
Contributor
ElliotFriend
left a comment
ElliotFriend
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
good fixes! thank you!!! 🎉
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implementing some of the past discussion1
Some more to do in good time, but that's true for a lot of the docs. 🫱🏼🫲🏽
I also tried messing around with the automation here (for #1044) and realized that there's a bit of formatting
inconsistencies in the meetings, which I'll tackle later per #1087. 👍🏾
Footnotes
Frankly I just couldn't stand seeing that
nginxso challenging to parse on mobile 🌐 ↩